2011
DOI: 10.5216/rpt.v40i1.13916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mobilização do Cálcio em Biomphalaria glabrata Exposta a Diferentes Quantidades de Carbonato de Cálcio

Abstract: Letras minúsculas diferentes -diferença significativa entre os grupos expostos no mesmo intervalo de tempo. Letras maiúsculas diferentes -diferença significativa entre o grupo exposto nos diferentes intervalos de tempo. dias 30 dias 45 diasControle 6,523 ± 1,189ª ,A 3,101 ± 0,383ª ,B 2,912 ± 0,3603 a,B 20mg CaCO 3 3,190 ± 1,047 b,A 2,383 ± 0,825ª ,b,B 1,499 ± 0,761 a,B

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, results from the present study indicated that the handmade shell-based substrate resulted in improved survival and growth rate, shell strength, and reproductive performance (short time of sexual maturation and increase in the rate of oviposition), which is comparable to results obtained from snails bred using the standardized substrate recommended by the Brazilian Ministry of Health. Improvements of B. glabrata physiological performance have already been demonstrated by several researchers, under laboratory conditions, when the aquatic environment in which they are bred has the presence of optimal levels of bioavailable calcium 10,12,18,19 . This demonstrates that B. glabrata shells can be an effective and low cost alternative to the calcium carbonate supplementation for the breeding of these snails in the laboratory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In general, results from the present study indicated that the handmade shell-based substrate resulted in improved survival and growth rate, shell strength, and reproductive performance (short time of sexual maturation and increase in the rate of oviposition), which is comparable to results obtained from snails bred using the standardized substrate recommended by the Brazilian Ministry of Health. Improvements of B. glabrata physiological performance have already been demonstrated by several researchers, under laboratory conditions, when the aquatic environment in which they are bred has the presence of optimal levels of bioavailable calcium 10,12,18,19 . This demonstrates that B. glabrata shells can be an effective and low cost alternative to the calcium carbonate supplementation for the breeding of these snails in the laboratory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In addition, the shells of Biomphalaria spp. participate directly in the regulation of calcium metabolism [ 28 ], which can also contribute to species differentiation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tenagophila and the possible potential for hybridization [ 23 , 30 ]. Considering that the shells composition reflects the metabolic projections of the animal, it was expected that the three species could be differentiated using the shells alone, possibly associated with the chemical and protein arrangement of the organic matrix of the shells of these animals [ 26 , 28 , 31 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, the exposure of B. glabrata to different concentrations of CaCO 3 caused no change in Ca 2+ concentration in the hemolymph, which suggests that this ion was transported via hemolymph to different reservoirs. Some of the possible reservoirs could be the shell (Marxen et al, 2003), the calcium cells present in the connective tissue of the snail (Davies and Erasmus, 1984), or it could be stored in the form of pearls in the digestive gland or intestine (Magalhães et al, 2011a). For this reason, the described increase in Ca 2+ in B. glabrata hemolymph when exposed to 20 mg/L CaCO 3 for fifteen days could be explained by the mobilization of this ion from the shell to the hemolymph to work as a buffering agent (Becker, 1980).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%