2006
DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200612002-00077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mobility Protocol for Acute Respiratory Failure Patients Delivered by an Icu Mobility Team Shortens Hospital Stay.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is likely that interventions have led to improvements in survival and the long‐term burden following critical illness [1, 2]. For example, early mobilisation was shown to reduce ICU and hospital stay for patients with acute respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation [35, 36] but the long‐term effects are unknown. The effect of interventions to improve long‐term outcomes e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is likely that interventions have led to improvements in survival and the long‐term burden following critical illness [1, 2]. For example, early mobilisation was shown to reduce ICU and hospital stay for patients with acute respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation [35, 36] but the long‐term effects are unknown. The effect of interventions to improve long‐term outcomes e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study 14 in which a mobility protocol was delivered by an ICU mobility team, both the ICU stay and the hospital stay were shortened for patients with respiratory failure who required mechanical ventilation. In a 22-month period, 309 N ew technologies in critical care and mechanical ventilation have led to longterm survival of critically ill patients and a dramatic increase in the number of ventilator-dependent patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adoption of modern ICU sedation practices in which benzodiazepine use is avoided, together with early mobilization and ambulation inclusive of ventilated patients were also significant changes to our GIP. 13,14 We speculate that these practice changes were also contributory to the lower mortality, lowreadmission rates and reintubation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%