2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10489-014-0642-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mnemonic shuffled frog leaping algorithm with cooperation and mutation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, the total population of frogs is found to be the most important parameter, proportional to the complexity of the problem, and max Di is typically 100% [21]. The number of memeplexes, m, is around 10% of n, and the number of local iterations before shuffling is generally between m/2 and m x 2 and the number of global iterations is typically from 100 to 1000 [22]. It is advisable to test a variety of parameter settings for any SFLA algorithm to find the fastest convergence.…”
Section: Optimization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the total population of frogs is found to be the most important parameter, proportional to the complexity of the problem, and max Di is typically 100% [21]. The number of memeplexes, m, is around 10% of n, and the number of local iterations before shuffling is generally between m/2 and m x 2 and the number of global iterations is typically from 100 to 1000 [22]. It is advisable to test a variety of parameter settings for any SFLA algorithm to find the fastest convergence.…”
Section: Optimization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulation results show that the resulting fuzzy controller outperformed the LQR controller. In addition, SFLA has been applied to pattern recognition [65], function optimization [66][67][68], signal and information processing [69], and other fields [70,71].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, the centroid of three new individuals was considered for the frog leaping rule. Hong-bo Wang et al [ 42 ] combined the historical information, information of the local frog and global frog substituted for the basic frog leaping search method, and the mutation operation by the normal distribution and Cauchy distribution was used for the globally best frog and the worst frog. Liu C et al [ 43 ] used the chaotic opposition-based learning to achieve the population initialization, and then the adaptive nonlinear inertia weight and the perturbation operator strategy based on Gaussian mutation were used for the balance between the exploration and the exploitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%