2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31295-3_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mixture of Experts Approach to Multi-strategy Image Quality Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to show dataset independent results, each introduced multimeasure was evaluated on all datasets. In the literature, some authors used different numbers of images from benchmarks for this purpose, e.g., 30% [13], [15], a one dataset [29], [24], [30], [18], [35], or even several datasets jointly, as in [20]. The following four IQA benchmarks were used: TID2013 [2], TID2008 [43], CSIQ [23], and LIVE [8], they are characterised in Table 1.…”
Section: Optimisation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to show dataset independent results, each introduced multimeasure was evaluated on all datasets. In the literature, some authors used different numbers of images from benchmarks for this purpose, e.g., 30% [13], [15], a one dataset [29], [24], [30], [18], [35], or even several datasets jointly, as in [20]. The following four IQA benchmarks were used: TID2013 [2], TID2008 [43], CSIQ [23], and LIVE [8], they are characterised in Table 1.…”
Section: Optimisation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the table, the best three results for a given benchmark are written in boldface, results not reported are denoted by "-". Some measures are not benchmark independent, i.e., their authors reported evaluation results on the benchmark that took part in the development of the measure without providing results for other benchmarks, or prepared a one IQA measure for each benchmark, also without cross-benchmark tests, e.g., [24], [26], [27], [29], [30], [31], [35], [36]. Results for approaches that are not dataset independent were excluded from comparison, they are written in italics in the table.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, the best three results for a given benchmark are written in boldface, results not reported are denoted by "-". Furthermore, "-" denotes overall results for IQA measures that were not evaluated on these three benchmarks or are not independent, i.e., authors developed a separate measure for each benchmark without providing cross-benchmark results ( [13,18,20,22,25,48]). …”
Section: Rmse(smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [17], SNR, SSIM, VIF, and VSNR were combined using canonical correlation analysis, and a regularised regression was used to combine up to seven IQA models in [13]. In [25], a support vector machines classifier used for predicting of the distortion followed by a fusion of SSIM, VSNR, and VIF using knearest-neighbour regression, was proposed. An adaptive combination of IQA approaches with an edge-quality based on preservation of edge direction was introduced in [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%