A Mixed Relationship: Bureaucracy and School Performance

Abstract

A Mixed Relationship: Bureaucracy and School PerformanceWe argue the negative relationship between school bureaucracy and school performance that is commonly reported in the bureaucracy and educational policy literature is theoretically and empirically incomplete. Like most public agencies operating in complex task environments, we suggest that schools have to make trade-offs between the multiple outputs they are expected to produce. Bureaucracy plays an important role in determining the nature of these trade-offs: one that is more multidimensional than it is portrayed in the existing literature. We find bureaucracy's relationship with school performance depends on how performance is measured. It is negatively associated with test scores but positively associated with other performance measures such as attendance and dropout rates. This is consistent with an economies-of-scope perspective of bureaucracy, which emphasizes bureaucracy's role in managing the trade-offs inherent in pursuing multiple goals.

What is the Effect of Performance Measurement on Perceived Accountability Effectiveness in State and Local Government Contracts?

“…The latter is important, as Cohen and Eimicke (2008, 155) argue: "innovation and customer needs may very well be less important than accountability and transparency." Nonetheless, public agencies pursue multiple goals when measuring organizational performance (Smith and Larimer 2004). Therefore, future studies should assess the impact of performance measurement on diverse programmatic and stakeholder outcomes (including creativity and customer needs).…”

A Systems Theory Approach to the District Central Office's Role in School-Level Improvement

“…Much of the current literature on district central offices focuses on specific actions district central offices enact to inhibit school improvement efforts or improving efficiency of services to schools (Fullan, 2009;Meier & Bohte, 2000;Smith & Larimar, 2004). A research gap exists on practical steps districts can enact for successful transformation (Honig, 2010).…”

The Contribution of Volunteering, Trust, and Networks to Educational Performance

“…If a clear link exists between social capital and policy performance, it would be tempting for policymakers to alter aspects of school provision and management to foster the accumulation of social capital, perhaps as part of a program to increase public values and the practice of good citizenship, while recognizing that families and communities are the main drivers. The social capital pathway may be seen to be an alternative or complement to other explanations of student performance, such as the strength of bureaucracy (Bohte, forthcoming; Meier, Wrinkle, & Polinard, 2000; Smith & Larimer, 2004), the span of control (Bohte & Meier, 2001), or more school choice (Schneider, Teske, & Marschall, 2000).…”