2020
DOI: 10.3390/s20216347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mixed-Perception Approach for Safe Human–Robot Collaboration in Industrial Automation

Abstract: Digital-enabled manufacturing systems require a high level of automation for fast and low-cost production but should also present flexibility and adaptiveness to varying and dynamic conditions in their environment, including the presence of human beings; however, this presence of workers in the shared workspace with robots decreases the productivity, as the robot is not aware about the human position and intention, which leads to concerns about human safety. This issue is addressed in this work by designing a … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(96 reference statements)
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Liu and Hao ( 2019 ) work on a scenario of multimodal CNNs and use a Leap Motion sensor for hand motion detection, as well as voice and body posture recognition. Amin et al ( 2020 ) aim to upgrade safety and security in an HRC scenario, by using a combination of human action recognition and tactile perception in order to distinguish between intentional and incidental interactions if physical contact between human operators and cobots takes place. A Panda robot, along with a 3D-CNN for human action recognition and a 1D-CNN for contact-type detection, was deployed.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu and Hao ( 2019 ) work on a scenario of multimodal CNNs and use a Leap Motion sensor for hand motion detection, as well as voice and body posture recognition. Amin et al ( 2020 ) aim to upgrade safety and security in an HRC scenario, by using a combination of human action recognition and tactile perception in order to distinguish between intentional and incidental interactions if physical contact between human operators and cobots takes place. A Panda robot, along with a 3D-CNN for human action recognition and a 1D-CNN for contact-type detection, was deployed.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one side, the robot must be aware of a human operator, and on the other side, the operator needs to be aware of the current status of the robot system. Advanced workplaces may include monitoring systems [ 4 , 5 , 6 ] enabling the robot to react to (and potentially predict [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ]) the operator’s movements by immediately stopping the activity or by replanning the trajectory [ 12 , 13 , 14 ]. However, a workspace monitoring system enabling the robot to avoid collisions can be considered as one-side awareness, but the other side of communication remains unresolved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fact may manifest in possible collisions, which are, however, relatively safe, as the collaborative robots are lightweight and highly sensitive to the impacts. Nevertheless, the perspective of active collision avoidance [2][3][4][5] may represent an efficiency boost to the work process, especially in work tasks with high variability. A collaborative workspace is a good example of a dynamic environment, where the human worker represents an element with the highest variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%