A mixed methods study on medicines information needs and challenges in New Zealand general practice

Abstract

Background Medicines are central to healthcare in aging populations with chronic multi-morbidity. Their safe and effective use relies on a large and constantly increasing knowledge base. Despite the current era of unprecedented access to information, there is evidence that unmet information needs remain an issue in clinical practice. Unmet medicines information needs may contribute to sub-optimal use of medicines and patient harm. Little is known about medicines information needs in the primary care setting. The aim of this study was to investigate the nature of medicines information needs in routine general practice and understand the challenges and influences on the information-seeking behaviour of general practitioners. Methods A mixed methods study involving 18 New Zealand general practitioner participants was undertaken. Quantitative data were collected to characterize the medicines information needs arising during 642 consultations conducted by the participants. Qualitative data regarding participant views on their medicines information needs, resources used, challenges to meeting the needs and potential solutions were collected by semi-structured interview. Integration occurred by comparison of results from each method. Results Of 642 consultations, 11% (n = 73/642) featured at least one medicines information need. The needs spanned 14 different categories with dosing the most frequent (26%) followed by side effects (15%) and drug interactions (14%). Two main themes describing the nature of general practitioners’ medicines information needs were identified from the qualitative data: a ‘common core’ related to medicine dose, side effects and interactions and a ‘perplexing periphery’. Challenges in the perplexing periphery were the variation in information needs, complexity, ‘known unknowns’ and ‘unknown unknowns’. Key factors affecting general practitioners’ strategies for meeting medicines information needs were trust in a resource, presence of the patient, how the information was presented, scarcity of time, awareness of the existence of a resource, and its accessibility. Conclusions General practitioners face challenges in meeting wide-ranging medicines information needs in patients with increasingly complex care needs. Recognising the challenges and factors that influence resource use in practice can inform optimisation of medicines information support resources. Resources for general practitioners must take into account the complexity and time constraints of real-world practice. An individually responsive approach involving greater collaboration with pharmacists and specialist medicines information support services may provide a potential solution.

Drug information-seeking behaviour among Jordanian physicians: a cross-sectional study

“…Additionally, younger doctors were easier to access and were more cooperative to participate in this study. Several studies note that a lack of time (Sharma et al, 2017;Campbell et al, 2021;Zielińska and Hermanowski, 2022) and limited access to credible drug information sources (Tumwikirize et al, 2008;Sharma et al, 2017;Zielińska and Hermanowski, 2022) are the main obstacles when searching for drug information; approximately a quarter of the physicians in this study reported that time constraints are a challenge. The most frequent challenges encountered concerned the vast number of available sources, knowing which sources are trusted and credible, and an inability to access subscription-only journals and websites, although these issues were less problematic for physicians who work, or have worked, in academia (p < 0.001).…”

Estimating Culprit Drugs for Adverse Drug Reactions Based on Bayesian Inference

“…Usually, they are required to carefully examine the drug information to consider the possibility of the culprit drugs. However, time constraints for medical practitioners in clinical settings pose a challenge in seeking drug information on each prescribed drug 32–34 . The ranking of drugs proposes a priority order to examine, leading to time‐saving for medical practitioners.…”

“…However, time constraints for medical practitioners in clinical settings pose a challenge in seeking drug information on each prescribed drug. [32][33][34] The ranking of drugs proposes a priority order to examine, leading to time-saving for medical practitioners. Besides, providing the ranking, instead of just suggesting one or two possible culprit drugs among all prescribed drugs, is expected to help prevent an erroneous identification of culprit drugs.…”

Drug information‐seeking behaviours of physicians, nurses and pharmacists: A systematic literature review

“…This systematic literature review included studies from 1st January 2000 to 16th May 2020. A re‐run of the search was performed in Jan 2022 and two new articles on drug ISB of physicians (Campbell et al, 2021; Jacquot et al, 2020) were found. While the data was not extracted and included in this systematic literature review, the findings are in line with the results of this review.…”