A mixed methods exploration of the role of multi-family groups in community treatment of patients with depression and anxiety in Pakistan

Abstract

Background An open, non-controlled trial was conducted to explore the feasibility, experiences and outcomes of multi-family groups in community mental health care of patients with depression and anxiety. Methods The study was conducted in community settings within the catchment area of a free of cost primary care center in Karachi, Pakistan. 30 patients with symptoms of depression and anxiety, their caregivers and 3 lay counsellors were recruited enrolled in the study between May–September 2019. Patients were enrolled for monthly multi-family group meetings conducted over 6 months in groups of 5–6 patients and 1–2 nominated caregivers each. Meetings were facilitated by the non-specialist trained counsellors. The primary outcome was quality of life (assessed using Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life) and secondary outcomes were symptoms of depression and anxiety (assessed on Aga Khan University Depression and Anxiety Scale), social outcomes (Social Outcome Index), and caregiver burden (Burden Assessment Scale). Change in all measures was assessed pre and 6-month post intervention using t-test. In-depth interviews were conducted with 7 patients, 7 caregivers and the 3 lay counsellors. Results A total of 36 family intervention meetings were conducted with six groups with a total of 30 patients, 34 caregivers and 3 counsellors. Between baseline and the end of the intervention, subjective quality of life increased significantly from 3.34 to 4.58 (p < 0.001, 95% CI 0.93–1.54). Self-reported depression and anxiety scores reduced from 34.7 to 19.5 (p < 0.001, 95% CI 10.8–19.8) and the Social Outcome Index improved from 3.63 to 4.52 (p < 0.001, 95% CI 0.39–1.39). There was no change in family burden. Participants reported that the group meetings were seen as a safe space for shared learning, and that the experience helped improve self-regulation of emotions and behaviors and instilled a sense of belonging. Conclusion Multi-family groups in community treatment of common mental health disorders facilitated by non-specialist mental health service providers is feasible, experienced positively and has the potential for large and positive effects on subjective quality of life, self-reported depression and anxiety, and objective social outcomes. Trial Registration: ISRCTN, ISRCTN12299326. Registered 05 June 2019. Retrospectively registered, https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN12299326.

Common patient experiences across three resource-oriented interventions for severe mental illness: a qualitative study in low-resource settings

“…Qualitative findings exploring patients’ experiences of taking part in the same interventions in other low-resource settings suggest similar results. For example, in Pakistan, multi-family groups were similarly valued for providing a non-judgemental space that promoted mutual learning [ 10 ]. In Colombia, the befriending program led to confidence-building and personal growth [ 15 ].…”

“…Both DIALOG+ [ 2 ] and befriending programmes [ 3 ] were found to have a positive impact on patients’ quality of life, and objective social situation and led to an improvement of symptoms. Family involvement was found to improve quality of life [ 10 ] and decrease the number of hospitalisations [ 11 ].…”

“…Befriending through volunteers was shown to lead to benefits such as reducing stigma and building relationships [ 4 , 13 ]. Family involvement interventions also were experienced positively by patients, providing a space conducive for shared learning to occur [ 7 , 10 ].…”

‘He was a brilliant student but became mad like his grandfather’: An exploratory investigation on the social perception and stigma against mental health patients in Bangladesh

“…It is considered the peak time for the onset of mental illness, which comprises anxiety and depression [23]. In certain instances, family members proactively consult with the doctor for medical assistance and permit the subject to spend more time with their peer group [24]. However, the subjects occasionally encountered reverse experiences.…”

Implementing psychosocial interventions within low and middle-income countries to improve community-based care for people with psychosis—A situation analysis

“…However, only two of the included studies were conducted in India and none were included from Pakistan ( 7 ). Since the review, there has been further evidence of the positive impact of psychosocial interventions on outcomes for people with psychosis ( 10 ) including in India ( 11 , 12 ) and Pakistan ( 13 , 14 ) whilst small-scale studies have indicated that community-based family intervention can be feasible and beneficial for patients with depression and anxiety ( 15 ). Despite, these positive outcomes, treatment for people with psychosis within India and Pakistan predominantly consists of antipsychotic medication and tends to center on inpatient and hospital-based services ( 7 ).…”