2020
DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2019.1705839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mixed-methods evaluation of college student and provider perspectives on a smartphone application for help-seeking after violence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 132 included apps, 104 (78.8%) had at least 1 rating listed (median user rating across rated apps was 4.20; however, the median number of user ratings across rated apps was 2, with a range of 1 to >21,000). These variations in how apps are marketed, downloaded, and shared among networks highlight 1 key area of their usefulness and 1 challenge in their dissemination in violence prevention and response work [ 20 , 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Of the 132 included apps, 104 (78.8%) had at least 1 rating listed (median user rating across rated apps was 4.20; however, the median number of user ratings across rated apps was 2, with a range of 1 to >21,000). These variations in how apps are marketed, downloaded, and shared among networks highlight 1 key area of their usefulness and 1 challenge in their dissemination in violence prevention and response work [ 20 , 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the apps were targeted at information sharing; something as simple as a test-retest knowledge assessment would provide at least basic data regarding whether the app is effective in increasing knowledge. There is also a precedent for evaluating mobile apps in their target population as well as with relevant service providers [ 20 , 21 , 29 , 50 - 54 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In some studies, the researchers reflected on why expected and/or significant results were not found, such as needing a greater focus on intervention fidelity to ensure that the interventions were delivered consistently across participants (e.g., Hatch et al, 2020 ). Additional issues identified that may have affected expected intervention outcomes included participant literacy level ( Alvarez et al, 2018 ; Anderson et al, 2021b ), small sample size ( Chidanand, 2014 ; Khaki, 2016 ), study samples lacking diversity, such as ethnic or racial diversity ( Anderson et al, 2021b ; Khaki, 2016 ), and access to technology ( Bacchus et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Health and Safety Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several sources were inclusive of women of various ethnic and racial backgrounds and nationalities, but only a few studies specifically compared results from different groups, such as African Americans and non-Hispanic White Americans ( Khaki, 2016 ) or focused on a specific group, such as South Asian women living in the United States ( Chidanand, 2014 ). One challenge identified was a high level of literacy needed to participate in the intervention ( Anderson et al, 2021b ).…”
Section: Intervention Feasibility and Acceptabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%