2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2014.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mixed integer programming approach for the single machine problem with unequal release dates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [29], the polyhedra of the position-oriented formulation was studied and valid inequalities was introduced. In recent years, the authors of [28] introduced additional valid inequalities for the position-oriented formulation based on the shortest processing time list-scheduling rule. In the same year, [10] used the position-oriented formulation with some valid inequalities to explore neighbourhoods in a matheuristic.…”
Section: Position-oriented Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [29], the polyhedra of the position-oriented formulation was studied and valid inequalities was introduced. In recent years, the authors of [28] introduced additional valid inequalities for the position-oriented formulation based on the shortest processing time list-scheduling rule. In the same year, [10] used the position-oriented formulation with some valid inequalities to explore neighbourhoods in a matheuristic.…”
Section: Position-oriented Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed model is based on the sequence position formulation [73,74], it consists in assigning each job to a position. A bigM constraint is included, proposed by Kooli and Serairi, for making the model in a linear form [75]. The model parameters are given below: N: The set of jobs {1, 2, ..., n}.…”
Section: Mathematical Model Before the Disruptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we describe a standard MILP formulation for the 0trueF2|rj,prmu|Cj that has been used for similar scheduling problems (see, for instance, Kooli and Serairi, ). In this formulation, Ck1 and Ck2 denote the completion time of the job in position k on machine M 1 and M 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Recalling Some Standard Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%