2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2018.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mixed-integer linear programming approach for energy-constrained mobile anchor path planning in wireless sensor networks localization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TDL [2] has significantly minimizes the spatial and temporal measurement numbers and pose better effectiveness and robustness, but the communication cost is high. MILP [3] achieves better determination of beacon point and has improved trajectory efficiency, localization accuracy and sensor nodes lifetime. The main issues related to this methodology is, it needs solution to mobile anchor path planning optimization problem.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TDL [2] has significantly minimizes the spatial and temporal measurement numbers and pose better effectiveness and robustness, but the communication cost is high. MILP [3] achieves better determination of beacon point and has improved trajectory efficiency, localization accuracy and sensor nodes lifetime. The main issues related to this methodology is, it needs solution to mobile anchor path planning optimization problem.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The symbols used in Equation ( 8) are described in paper. 37 Kouroshnezhad et al 38 have proposed the OPTEC scheme. The proposed method follows the MILP approach selecting an optimal path for the sensor nodes which are not aware of their location.…”
Section: F I G U R E 1 6 Machine Learning Techniques For Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the length of the path traveled by the MA is long. Kouroshnezhad et al 41 and Xu et al 42 are some of the studies using the LMAT mobility model. The LMAT path planning is shown in Figure 3C.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%