2017
DOI: 10.1093/imanum/drx066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mixed finite element method for a sixth-order elliptic problem

Abstract: We consider a saddle-point formulation for a sixth-order partial differential equation and its finite element approximation, for two sets of boundary conditions. We follow the Ciarlet-Raviart formulation for the biharmonic problem to formulate our saddle-point problem and the finite element method. The new formulation allows us to use the H 1 -conforming Lagrange finite element spaces to approximate the solution. We prove A priori error estimates for our approach. Numerical results are presented for linear and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 2.1. For every φ h ∈ P 1 h (Ω) there exists a unique global minimum Φ ∈ H k (Ω) of the functional J defined in (2).…”
Section: Analytical Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theorem 2.1. For every φ h ∈ P 1 h (Ω) there exists a unique global minimum Φ ∈ H k (Ω) of the functional J defined in (2).…”
Section: Analytical Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to solve this numerically, we will reformulate this PDE of 6th order into a system of three PDEs of 2nd order. This is one of the possible techniques to handle higher order PDEs as demonstrated in [2] and [14]. This gives us the benefit of directly receiving the Laplacian as part of the solution.…”
Section: Reformulation From Higher Order To a System Of 2nd Ordermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And some H m -nonconforming elements of lower degree on triangular meshes for any m were studied in [17]. In addition to standard conforming and nonconforming finite element methods, a C 0 interior penalty method in [14] and a cubic H 3nonconforming macro-element method in [18] were developed for a sixth-order elliptic equation in two dimensions, and some mixed finite element methods were advanced in [12,13,20] for 2mth-order elliptic equations with m > n. When m ≤ n, We refer to [3,27,28,15] for H m -conforming finite elements, and [23,22] for H m -nonconforming finite elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, some finite element schemes are developed for arbitrary order of derivative (i.e. [13,14,15]). For meshless methods based on the shape functions, there is no problem for the mesh construction in the higher dimensional space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%