1984
DOI: 10.1016/0898-1221(84)90052-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mixed finite element method for fourth order elliptic equations with variable coefficients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact checks the consistency of explicit difference scheme (10). Note that due to the truncation error is of order O(h + k 2 ) we have refined in axis x.…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This fact checks the consistency of explicit difference scheme (10). Note that due to the truncation error is of order O(h + k 2 ) we have refined in axis x.…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 94%
“…obtaining the explicit difference scheme (10) where the parameter α was defined in (7). Now we are going to study the consistency of constructed scheme (10) with Eq.…”
Section: Discretization and Consistencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a resuit, it would be interesting to study the nature and behaviour of finite element approximations of degree one for oe in the global discretization scheme developed hère. Other different choices such as the use of quadratic éléments for co in (6.4) and éléments of degree one for y/ in équation (6.3) may further improve the results of approximation, but this is nothing but a conjecture (see [3]). …”
Section: R=(h-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed to our knowledge, [8] is probably the first publication on the estimates for the combined effect of boundary approximation and numerical integration on the mixed finite element approximation of (simple) eigenvalues and eigenvectors of 4th order self-adjoint eigenvalue problems with variable/constant coefficients, many proofs in which, as stated earlier, have remained quite technical in spite of the best efforts of the authors to avoid these technical aspects in some proofs. The present paper, the results of which were announced in [8] (see also [31]), relies heavily on [10] for the corresponding source problem ( [9] contains error estimates due to polygonal approximation of the curved boundary along with numerical integration for the same source problem) and also on the results of [4] on the mixed method scheme (see also [33,36]) for polygonal domains. For other interesting references on eigenvalue approximations, we refer to [2,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%