2019
DOI: 10.1002/qj.3501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mixed finite‐element, finite‐volume, semi‐implicit discretization for atmospheric dynamics: Cartesian geometry

Abstract: To meet the challenges posed by future generations of massively parallel supercomputers, a reformulation of the dynamical core for the Met Office's weather and climate model is presented. This new dynamical core uses explicit finite‐volume type discretizations for the transport of scalar fields coupled with an iterated‐implicit, mixed finite‐element discretization for all other terms. The target model aims to maintain the accuracy, stability and mimetic properties of the existing Met Office model independent o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
108
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Driven by its negative buoyancy, the initial perturbation moves downwards, impacts the bottom boundary and travels sideways developing vortices (Figure 3). The numerical solution converges with increasing spatial resolution (Figure 4), and the final perturbation amplitude and front position agree with published results ( Table 1, for comparison see, e.g., [17] and the similar table in [30]). The final minimum potential temperature perturbation at 25 m resolution agrees with the result in [30] up to the third decimal digit.…”
Section: Density Currentsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Driven by its negative buoyancy, the initial perturbation moves downwards, impacts the bottom boundary and travels sideways developing vortices (Figure 3). The numerical solution converges with increasing spatial resolution (Figure 4), and the final perturbation amplitude and front position agree with published results ( Table 1, for comparison see, e.g., [17] and the similar table in [30]). The final minimum potential temperature perturbation at 25 m resolution agrees with the result in [30] up to the third decimal digit.…”
Section: Density Currentsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Examples of operational dynamical cores using semi-implicit timeintegrations strategies are the ECMWF 1 's IFS [19], that discretizes the hydrostatic primitive equations, and the UK Met Office's ENDGame [9,50]. In particular, ENDGame uses a double-loop structure in the implicit solver entailing four solves per time step in its operational incarnation, a strategy carried over in recent developments [30], and allowing non-operational configurations to run stably and second-order accurately without additional numerical damping (for operational forecasts, a small amount of off-centering is usually employed for safety reasons). By contrast, many other semi-implicit or time-split explicit discretizations resort to off-centering, divergence damping [10], or otherwise artificial diffusion in order to quell numerical instabilities.…”
Section: Related Numerical Schemes In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This test case is especially challenging for our higher order spectral element formulation, firstly since we have not applied any sort of upwinding or monotonicity preservation method to either the continuity or temperature equation, and secondly because unlike other models we formulate our energy equation as a flux form equation for the density weighted potential temperature, Θ = ρθ, from which the potential temperature, θ, is then diagnosed. This is in contrast to a material form of the potential temperature advection, in which upwinding is directly applied in the flux reconstruction [12]. For this reason we configure our model with slightly higher resolution than that specified [40].…”
Section: Non-hydrostatic Gravity Wavementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pairings including the RT or BDM spaces such as RT k × DG k−1 or BDM k × DG k−1 fall within the set of compatible mixed spaces ideal for geophysical fluids (Cotter and Shipton, 2012;Natale et al, 2016;Melvin et al, 2018). In particular, the lowestorder RT method (RT 1 × DG 0 ) on a structured quadrilateral grid (such as the latitude-longitude grid used many operational dynamical cores) corresponds to the Arakawa C-grid finite difference discretization.…”
Section: Semi-implicit Finite Element Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%