2017
DOI: 10.4401/ag-7333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mixed automatic-manual seismic catalog for Central-Eastern Italy: analysis of homogeneity

Abstract: A comparison between pickings and locations obtained by automatic and manual procedures in the analysis of the seismicity of Central-East

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S4 ). These locations (EQS-Catalog in supplementary material) were derived from developing a mixed automatic-manual seismic catalog for eastern Central Italy 35 , 36 . We used P- and S-phases detected by human operators (period 2009–2013) and by the automatic RSNI-Picker (period 2014–2016) and its updated version (2017) 37 .…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S4 ). These locations (EQS-Catalog in supplementary material) were derived from developing a mixed automatic-manual seismic catalog for eastern Central Italy 35 , 36 . We used P- and S-phases detected by human operators (period 2009–2013) and by the automatic RSNI-Picker (period 2014–2016) and its updated version (2017) 37 .…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difficulty in considering this parameter is due to the uncertainty associated with the depth itself, not only for historical earthquakes but also for recent events located in areas that are geologically complex or not monitored by a dense seismic network. To explore the variation in the attenuation steepness with depth, we therefore used three of the models that explicitly include this parameter: the IPE by Tosi et al (2015), the IPE by Musson (2013), and the GMPE by Cauzzi and Faccioli (2008). We chose these functions because they feature a simple functional form which determines a magnitude-independent attenuation steepness, as suggested by real earthquake data.…”
Section: Comparison With Synthetic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition we show that, even using an IPE, 50 km is a reasonable limit for a linear regression that approximates the first part of the attenuation curve well. Figure 7b shows the steepness of the regression lines, thus calculated as a function of the earthquake focal depth, and the values, calculated with the same method, derived from PGA using the GMPE proposed by Cauzzi and Faccioli (2008), converted into macroseismic intensity. It is worth noting that differences caused by the use of two different conversion equations are greater than the differences caused by the use of the IPE in place of the GMPE.…”
Section: Comparison With Synthetic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The continuous seismic data recorded by the 19 accelerometers are transmitted in real time and processed after the automatic detection of an earthquake by the acquisition system of the regional seismic network in Ancona ONT-INGV headquarter (Cattaneo et al, 2017). A time window containing the earthquake waveform is extracted: the start is 10 s before P arrival and the length is the double time of significant duration D, calculated from 5 to 95% of the Arias Intensity (Cauzzi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Structural Health Monitoring For the Strategic Public Buildingsmentioning
confidence: 99%