2013
DOI: 10.1177/0954406213484424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mixed approach for the control of a testing equipment employed for earthquake isolation systems

Abstract: This paper presents an activity concerning the modelling and control of a system adopted to perform shear tests on seismic isolators. The test rig consists of a hydraulic actuation system that drives a sliding table mounted on linear bearings. The system is characterized by non-linearities such as hydraulic proportional valve dead zone and frictions. A non-linear model is derived and then employed for parameter identification procedure. The test rig needs a suitable controller able to guarantee the desired tab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A variability is considered for all the parameters of the hydraulic actuator, including the geometric parameters and the supply pressure. The nominal values have been derived by means of an identification procedure based on minimization of the least square error between experimental data and the simulated ones . They are set as follows: leftmtrue^=540kg,σtrue^=22500Nsnormalm,trueF^C=950N,μtrue^=0.03,Ntrue^=67000N,trueA^p=0.0055normalm2,trueV^0=0.0035normalm3,βtrue^=0.75e9Pa,trueK^Q=2.1082e7m3sVPa12,trueu^+=0.65V,trueu^=0.65V,trueP^S=110e5Pa.…”
Section: Simulation and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A variability is considered for all the parameters of the hydraulic actuator, including the geometric parameters and the supply pressure. The nominal values have been derived by means of an identification procedure based on minimization of the least square error between experimental data and the simulated ones . They are set as follows: leftmtrue^=540kg,σtrue^=22500Nsnormalm,trueF^C=950N,μtrue^=0.03,Ntrue^=67000N,trueA^p=0.0055normalm2,trueV^0=0.0035normalm3,βtrue^=0.75e9Pa,trueK^Q=2.1082e7m3sVPa12,trueu^+=0.65V,trueu^=0.65V,trueP^S=110e5Pa.…”
Section: Simulation and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variability is considered for all the parameters of the hydraulic actuator, including the geometric parameters and the supply pressure. The nominal values have been derived by means of an identification procedure based on minimization of the least square error between experimental data and the simulated ones [13,19,23,24]. They are set as follows: ;û þ ¼ 0:65 V;û À ¼ À0:65 V;…”
Section: Simulation and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2), available at the Department of Industrial Engineering of the University of Naples Federico II (Italy), consisting of a horizontal hydraulic actuator, powered by a 75 kW AC electric motor, which allows to impose both load or displacement histories. The maximum horizontal force is 50 kN, the maximum speed is 2.2 m/s, the maximum stroke is ± 0.2 m. A hydraulic jack allows to apply a vertical load up to 190 kN during the tests [11]. show the symmetric force-displacement hysteresis loops obtained in Roll and Shear directions at small, relatively large, and large displacements, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…8). The plant is typically employed for seismic testing [32] and its actuation system is constituted by a double-ended hydraulic cylinder (Fig. 9), an axial piston pump, powered by a 75 kW AC electric motor, a pressure relief valve and a four way-three position proportional valve.…”
Section: The Experimental Test Benchmentioning
confidence: 99%