Abstract:Mitophagy is a fundamental quality control mechanism of mitochondria. Its regulatory mechanisms and pathological implications remain poorly understood. Here, via a mitochondria-targeted genetic screen, we found that knockout (KO) of FBXL4, a mitochondrial disease gene, hyperactivates mitophagy at basal conditions. Subsequent counter screen revealed that FBXL4-KO hyperactivates mitophagy via two mitophagy receptors BNIP3 and NIX. We determined that FBXL4 functions as an integral outer-membrane protein that form… Show more
“…Early studies identified transcriptional regulation by hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) as a key facet of BNIP3 and NIX regulation 4 . Consistent with this model, both BNIP3 and NIX expression and associated mitophagy are potently induced upon hypoxia onset 14 . Recently, multiple groups have extended this model, reporting that the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) potently restricts BNIP3 and NIX levels to further curb mitophagy [12][13][14][15][16][17] .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Consistent with this model, both BNIP3 and NIX expression and associated mitophagy are potently induced upon hypoxia onset 14 . Recently, multiple groups have extended this model, reporting that the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) potently restricts BNIP3 and NIX levels to further curb mitophagy [12][13][14][15][16][17] . In light of these concepts, it is important to develop a unified understanding of how steady-state levels of these mitophagy receptors are established and maintained, and how this regulation governs underlying cell physiology.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Early models for BNIP3-mediated mitophagy centered on its transcriptional control, particularly in response to hypoxic stress 4,71 . Recently, these models have been appended to account for post-translational control by the ubiquitin-proteasome system [12][13][14][15][16]56,72 . Using an unbiased, genome-wide CRISPR screen, we similarly identified a role for the ubiquitin-proteasome system in regulating BNIP3, providing independent support for these models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-translational control of BNIP3 stability was previously reported to depend on the ubiquitin-proteasome system [12][13][14][15][16][54][55][56] . Consistent with these reports, our list of genetic effectors recovered numerous UPS factors previously implicated in the regulation of BNIP3, including proteasomal subunits, the NEDD8 conjugation machinery, and the membrane protein extratase valosin-containing protein (VCP).…”
Section: Proteasomal Degradation Restricts Bnip3 Levels But Not Lysos...mentioning
Lysosomal degradation of autophagy receptors is a common proxy for selective autophagy. However, we find that two established mitophagy receptors, BNIP3 and BNIP3L/NIX, violate this assumption. Rather, BNIP3 and NIX are constitutively delivered to lysosomes in an autophagy-independent manner. This alternative lysosomal delivery of BNIP3 accounts for nearly all of its lysosome-mediated degradation, even upon mitophagy induction. To identify how BNIP3, a tail-anchored protein in the outer mitochondrial membrane, is delivered to lysosomes, we performed a genome-wide CRISPR screen for factors influencing BNIP3 flux. By this approach, we revealed both known modifiers of BNIP3 stability as well as a pronounced reliance on endolysosomal components, including the ER membrane protein complex (EMC). Importantly, the endolysosomal system regulates BNIP3 alongside, but independent of, the ubiquitin-proteosome system (UPS). Perturbation of either mechanism is sufficient to modulate BNIP3-associated mitophagy and affect underlying cellular physiology. In short, while BNIP3 can be cleared by parallel and partially compensatory quality control pathways, non-autophagic lysosomal degradation of BNIP3 is a strong post-translational modifier of BNIP3 function. More broadly, these data reveal an unanticipated connection between mitophagy and TA protein quality control, wherein the endolysosomal system provides a critical axis for regulating cellular metabolism. Moreover, these findings extend recent models for tail-anchored protein quality control and install endosomal trafficking and lysosomal degradation in the canon of pathways that ensure tight regulation of endogenous TA protein localization.
“…Early studies identified transcriptional regulation by hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) as a key facet of BNIP3 and NIX regulation 4 . Consistent with this model, both BNIP3 and NIX expression and associated mitophagy are potently induced upon hypoxia onset 14 . Recently, multiple groups have extended this model, reporting that the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) potently restricts BNIP3 and NIX levels to further curb mitophagy [12][13][14][15][16][17] .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Consistent with this model, both BNIP3 and NIX expression and associated mitophagy are potently induced upon hypoxia onset 14 . Recently, multiple groups have extended this model, reporting that the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) potently restricts BNIP3 and NIX levels to further curb mitophagy [12][13][14][15][16][17] . In light of these concepts, it is important to develop a unified understanding of how steady-state levels of these mitophagy receptors are established and maintained, and how this regulation governs underlying cell physiology.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Early models for BNIP3-mediated mitophagy centered on its transcriptional control, particularly in response to hypoxic stress 4,71 . Recently, these models have been appended to account for post-translational control by the ubiquitin-proteasome system [12][13][14][15][16]56,72 . Using an unbiased, genome-wide CRISPR screen, we similarly identified a role for the ubiquitin-proteasome system in regulating BNIP3, providing independent support for these models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-translational control of BNIP3 stability was previously reported to depend on the ubiquitin-proteasome system [12][13][14][15][16][54][55][56] . Consistent with these reports, our list of genetic effectors recovered numerous UPS factors previously implicated in the regulation of BNIP3, including proteasomal subunits, the NEDD8 conjugation machinery, and the membrane protein extratase valosin-containing protein (VCP).…”
Section: Proteasomal Degradation Restricts Bnip3 Levels But Not Lysos...mentioning
Lysosomal degradation of autophagy receptors is a common proxy for selective autophagy. However, we find that two established mitophagy receptors, BNIP3 and BNIP3L/NIX, violate this assumption. Rather, BNIP3 and NIX are constitutively delivered to lysosomes in an autophagy-independent manner. This alternative lysosomal delivery of BNIP3 accounts for nearly all of its lysosome-mediated degradation, even upon mitophagy induction. To identify how BNIP3, a tail-anchored protein in the outer mitochondrial membrane, is delivered to lysosomes, we performed a genome-wide CRISPR screen for factors influencing BNIP3 flux. By this approach, we revealed both known modifiers of BNIP3 stability as well as a pronounced reliance on endolysosomal components, including the ER membrane protein complex (EMC). Importantly, the endolysosomal system regulates BNIP3 alongside, but independent of, the ubiquitin-proteosome system (UPS). Perturbation of either mechanism is sufficient to modulate BNIP3-associated mitophagy and affect underlying cellular physiology. In short, while BNIP3 can be cleared by parallel and partially compensatory quality control pathways, non-autophagic lysosomal degradation of BNIP3 is a strong post-translational modifier of BNIP3 function. More broadly, these data reveal an unanticipated connection between mitophagy and TA protein quality control, wherein the endolysosomal system provides a critical axis for regulating cellular metabolism. Moreover, these findings extend recent models for tail-anchored protein quality control and install endosomal trafficking and lysosomal degradation in the canon of pathways that ensure tight regulation of endogenous TA protein localization.
“…It is this latter scenario that appears to underlie a rare form of mitochondrial disease characterised by a mutation in FBXL4, the substrate binding component of a particular cullin‐RING E3 ubiquitin ligase (CRL) (Alsina et al , 2020). Three new EMBO Journal publications have now elucidated the mechanism behind how FBXL4 regulates mitophagy, shedding light on the pathology of this debilitating disease and opening potential therapeutic opportunities (Cao et al , 2023; Elcocks et al , 2023; Nguyen‐Dien et al , 2023).…”
Section: Figure Fbxl4 Represses Mitophagy By Controlling Mitochondria...mentioning
How mitophagy is turned on to remove damaged or excess mitochondria from cells has been well‐studied, but less is known about how the pathway is turned off to avoid “over‐eating” of mitochondria under basal conditions. Three new studies now reveal the disease‐associated FBXL4 protein as an important negative regulator of constitutive mitophagy, controlling the stability of mitophagy receptors BNIP3 and NIX.
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are associated with oocyte maturation inhibition, and N‐acetyl‐l‐cysteine (NAC) partially reduces their harmful effects. Mitochondrial E3 ubiquitin ligase 1 (Mul1) localizes to the mitochondrial outer membrane. We found that female Mul1‐deficient mice are infertile, and their oocytes contain high ROS concentrations. After fertilization, Mul1‐deficient embryos showed a DNA damage response (DDR) and abnormal preimplantation embryogenesis, which was rescued by NAC addition and ROS depletion. These observations clearly demonstrate that loss of Mul1 in oocytes increases ROS concentrations and triggers DDR, resulting in abnormal preimplantation embryogenesis. We conclude that manipulating the mitochondrial ROS levels in oocytes may be a potential therapeutic approach to target infertility.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.