2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12052-010-0240-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Missing Link: K-4 Biological Evolution Content Standards

Abstract: The National Science Education Standards (NSES) is one of the most influential documents in US science education. The NSES has been utilized by local schools and districts, state departments of education, and national curriculum groups to form the backbone for curriculum frameworks, programs, and assessment systems to guide science education. The NSES provides national biological evolution content standards for fifth grade through high school but not for kindergarten through fourth grade. This article presents… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This activity also allows students to recognize the large number and diversity of extant species and provides them tools to classify organisms according to their features, a goal that is common to the vast majority of official curricula here analyzed (Additional file 1 and references therein). Activities similar to the present one have already been suggested for exploring evolution in elementary schools, using both extant (Chanet and Lusignan 2009) and extinct species (Wagler 2010). However, we further Figure 9 Examples of answers given by students in the assessment of the knowledge about macroevolution.…”
Section: Systematicsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This activity also allows students to recognize the large number and diversity of extant species and provides them tools to classify organisms according to their features, a goal that is common to the vast majority of official curricula here analyzed (Additional file 1 and references therein). Activities similar to the present one have already been suggested for exploring evolution in elementary schools, using both extant (Chanet and Lusignan 2009) and extinct species (Wagler 2010). However, we further Figure 9 Examples of answers given by students in the assessment of the knowledge about macroevolution.…”
Section: Systematicsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…When Jeffery and Roach (1994) reviewed American textbooks for primary education, they ascertained that the useful understructures of evolution "are not developed throughout the elementary years and thus do not provide the strong framework necessary for students to construct a scientific understanding of evolution" (p. 515). Also, in a recent publication, Wagler (2010) notes the absence of biological evolution from the national standards of the United States for grades Κ-4 and considers this to affect the students' "educational success when they are introduced to the complex interactions of organisms and environments" and their "overall long-term biological development, i.e., knowledge and application of that knowledge. "…”
Section: Comments and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…USA scholars are calling for similar educational strategies in their school system (e.g. Wagler 2010Wagler , 2012Williams 2009), claiming that it would highly prevent the build-up of preconceptions and mis-conceptions, so difficult to correct at later educational stages (Kampourakis and Zogza 2009;). However, although the Italian school seems to be prone to an early encounter with the Darwinian theory, it is not providing for sufficiently effective tools to ensure a thorough and clear understanding of its facts and mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%