2012 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics 2012
DOI: 10.1109/iccci.2012.6158777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Minimum Makespan Grid Workflow Scheduling algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is simple approach to model workflow time, but it does not allow to measure possible estimation error. Some examples can be found in [6,7,15]. The last type of assumptions exploits random nature of execution time and has a potential to give the most accurate runtime predictions.…”
Section: Execution Time In Workflow Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is simple approach to model workflow time, but it does not allow to measure possible estimation error. Some examples can be found in [6,7,15]. The last type of assumptions exploits random nature of execution time and has a potential to give the most accurate runtime predictions.…”
Section: Execution Time In Workflow Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scheduling problem consists of mapping tasks to nodes optimally. Often used approach to represent workflow is a directed acyclic graph (DAG) [4,6,7]. It is well-known that complexity of a general scheduling problem in DAG is NP-Complete [8], thus many heuristics exist that provide near-optimal solution to the scheduling problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some examples of scheduling systems that can use any implementations of the runtime estimation module are CLAVIRE [5], [6], a scheduling framework proposed by Ling Yuan et al [7], and CLOWDRB by Somasundaram and Govindarajan [8]. task ranking and makespans [9], [10] architecture [11], [12], [7], [8] random -Chebyshev inequalities [13], composing quantiles [14] fixed NP parallelizing models [15], [16], [17] optimization algorithms [9], [18], [19], [20] ordinal Round-Robin, greedy etc. [21], [20] -There are no papers dedicated specifically to the workflow runtime estimation problem known to us.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several papers are difficult to be classified due to two reasons: first, some approaches stay between two classes (e.g. in [9], [15], [16], [17], [10] the execution time is calculated as a mean of random variable, but the variance of the time is not used); second, some researchers focus more on the architecture of scheduling software than on the algorithms, so one can use different estimate representations [12], [8], [7].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation