2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11750-009-0115-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A minimum dimensional class of simple games

Abstract: Simple games, Hypergraphs, Boolean algebra, Dimension, Codimension, 05C65, 91A12, 94C10,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We surmise that several alternative ways of accomplishing this might be available, but at present none of them seems simple and convincing. Perhaps some notion of dimension for simple voting games, such as those introduced in Freixas and Marciniak (2009) The adjective 'raw' refers to an index prior to normalization by the sum of voting weights. Non-numbered games have quota q = w(N ) − q + 1, where q is the quota of the preceding game.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We surmise that several alternative ways of accomplishing this might be available, but at present none of them seems simple and convincing. Perhaps some notion of dimension for simple voting games, such as those introduced in Freixas and Marciniak (2009) The adjective 'raw' refers to an index prior to normalization by the sum of voting weights. Non-numbered games have quota q = w(N ) − q + 1, where q is the quota of the preceding game.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result for intersection (dimension concept) was first shown in [38] for hypergraphs, and then expressed for simple games in [52]. The result for union (codimension concept) was introduced for simple games in [25]. A simple game is said to be of dimension (codimension) k if and only if it can be represented as the intersection (union) of exactly k weighted games, but not as the intersection (union) of (k − 1) weighted games.…”
Section: Definitions and Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, as any simple game can be represented as an intersection or union of a finite number of weighted games, we have an alternative way to show the completeness of the family of weighted influence games with respect to the class of simple games (Theorem 1). However, as the dimension, the codimension, and the representation as a boolean weighted game of a simple game might be exponential in the number of players (but bounded by the number of maximal losing, minimal winning coalitions, or both, respectively) [28,25,22], we cannot conclude that any simple game can be represented by a weighted influence game whose number of agents is polynomial in the number of players. For the particular case of unweighted influence game we know the following.…”
Section: Expressivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact the relationship might be complex as it is known that, given two realizations, determine whether both represent the same weighted game is an NP-hard problem (Matsui and Matsui, 2000). For some studies related to the minimal realization of a weighted game, see Freixas and Kurz, 2014;Freixas andMarciniak, 2009 andFreixas andMolinero, 2010. Despite the fact that weighted games are a strict subclass of simple games, a well known result says that every simple game can be expressed as the intersection of a finite number of weighted…”
Section: Weighted Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to such representation as co-vector-weighted representation form (co-VWRF). It is known that any simple game can be expressed as the union of a finite family of weighted games (Freixas and Marciniak, 2009). Therefore, co-VWRF is a valid representation form for simple games.…”
Section: Weighted Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%