“…Thus, as any simple game can be represented as an intersection or union of a finite number of weighted games, we have an alternative way to show the completeness of the family of weighted influence games with respect to the class of simple games (Theorem 1). However, as the dimension, the codimension, and the representation as a boolean weighted game of a simple game might be exponential in the number of players (but bounded by the number of maximal losing, minimal winning coalitions, or both, respectively) [28,25,22], we cannot conclude that any simple game can be represented by a weighted influence game whose number of agents is polynomial in the number of players. For the particular case of unweighted influence game we know the following.…”