2001
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45729-1_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Minimum Description Length Approach to Statistical Shape Modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
90
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Sun et al [15], the ardiac dynamics is learnt by using a second order dynamic model. Davies et al [16] propose a method to automatically extract a set of optimal landmarks using the minimum description length (MDL). But it is not clear whether the landmarks thus extracted are optimal in the sense of anatomical correspondence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Sun et al [15], the ardiac dynamics is learnt by using a second order dynamic model. Davies et al [16] propose a method to automatically extract a set of optimal landmarks using the minimum description length (MDL). But it is not clear whether the landmarks thus extracted are optimal in the sense of anatomical correspondence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was developed further by Cootes et al [35] who modelled both 2D shape and appearance in their widely used Active Appearance Model framework. More recently, groupwise alignment has been used to automatically register samples of images using both stochastic [83] and minimum description length [84] approaches. In 3D, Blanz and Vetter [25] used a version of optical flow applied to cylindrical parameterisations of the face surfaces to establish dense correspondence between each face and a chosen template face (i.e.…”
Section: Statistical Face Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [19], the cardiac dynamics is learnt by using a second-order dynamic model. Davies et al in [20] propose a method to automatically extract a set of optimal landmarks using the minimum description length. But it is not clear whether the landmarks thus extracted are optimal in the sense of anatomical correspondence.…”
Section: Knowledge-based Cardiac Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%