2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11128-018-1997-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A minimal set of measurements for qudit-state tomography based on unambiguous discrimination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, when the quantum states of Alice are linearly independent, it is possible for Bob to develop a strategy whereby he can trust his conclusive result 6 , 7 . This strategy is called unambiguous discrimination 8 12 , which can be applied to not only quantum key distribution (QKD) 13 but also quantum state tomography 14 . The maximal confidence strategy 15 is one where Bob sets up a measurement and maximizes the confidence of the conclusive result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, when the quantum states of Alice are linearly independent, it is possible for Bob to develop a strategy whereby he can trust his conclusive result 6 , 7 . This strategy is called unambiguous discrimination 8 12 , which can be applied to not only quantum key distribution (QKD) 13 but also quantum state tomography 14 . The maximal confidence strategy 15 is one where Bob sets up a measurement and maximizes the confidence of the conclusive result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that quantum state discrimination provides a variety of quantum information protocols. Especially, unambiguous discrimination can be fruitfully applied to quantum key distribution (QKD) 24 , quantum random number generator 25 and quantum state tomography 26 .…”
Section: Generalized Sequential State Discrimination For Multiparty Qmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, the sender sends the state to the receiver, and the receiver determines what the state is. In the state discrimination, there are many strategies such as minimum error discrimination (MED) [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ], unambiguous discrimination [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ], discrimination with a fixed error [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ] etc. In particular, the MED is the optimal measurement strategy that minimizes the average error probability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%