Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1992
DOI: 10.1094/phyto-82-1333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Midgut Barrier to Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus Acquisition by Adult Western Flower Thrips

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
115
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
115
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…F. occidentalis and TSWV isolate MT2 were originally collected in Hawaii. Thrips were reared on green bean pods (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), and virus was maintained in Emelia sonchifolia (L.) as previously described (35). Virus-infected and control treatment groups were obtained by allowing first instar thrips 24 h of access to infected and uninfected E. sonchifolia leaves, respectively, as previously described (35).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…F. occidentalis and TSWV isolate MT2 were originally collected in Hawaii. Thrips were reared on green bean pods (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), and virus was maintained in Emelia sonchifolia (L.) as previously described (35). Virus-infected and control treatment groups were obtained by allowing first instar thrips 24 h of access to infected and uninfected E. sonchifolia leaves, respectively, as previously described (35).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gut bacteria have to be acquired via food contaminated by the bacteria in frass, saliva, and faeces of other thrips (De Vries et al, 2008 Variation in the capacity of the various stages to ingest or transmit viruses has been previously recorded (Ammar, 1994;. Several reasons have been suggested to account for this variation, such as, the mid-gut barriers to infection differ between larval stages (Ullman et al, 1992), the barriers between the midgut and salivary glands may differ (Moritz et al, 2004), and/or there is variation in efficiency with which the salivary glands are infected . The omnipresence of gut bacteria in old first and second instar larvae, and their absence in young first instar larvae, led us to formulate the hypothesis that the increase in the number of gut bacteria is negatively associated with the ability to transmit tospovirus, because the bacteria adversely affect the ability of the virus to infect mid-gut epithelial cells and its subsequent transmission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WFT transmits the virus in a circulative and propagative persistent manner (Ullman et al, 1993;. Transmission is unique in that TSWV can only be acquired by thrips larvae and transmitted by second larval instars or adults (Ullman et al, 1992a;. Adult thrips are considered to be the most important cause of virus dispersal because of their greater mobility (Cho et al, 1989;German et al, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%