2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.12.16.423127
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A midbrain - thalamus - cortex circuit reorganizes cortical dynamics to initiate planned movement

Abstract: Motor behaviors are often planned long before execution, but only released after specific sensory events. Planning and execution are each associated with distinct patterns of motor cortex activity. Key questions are how these dynamic activity patterns are generated and how they relate to behavior. Here we investigate the multi-regional neural circuits that link an auditory ‘go cue’ and the transition from planning to execution of directional licking. Ascending glutamatergic neurons in the midbrain reticular an… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(behaviour) Activating MRN/PPN terminals in the ipsilateral ALM-projecting thalamus, even unilaterally, did not bias licking in one direction or another, but triggered licking in a direction appropriate to the prior stimulus (Inagaki et al, 2020).…”
Section: Appendix 3: Triggered Behaviours -Pursuit and Escapementioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(behaviour) Activating MRN/PPN terminals in the ipsilateral ALM-projecting thalamus, even unilaterally, did not bias licking in one direction or another, but triggered licking in a direction appropriate to the prior stimulus (Inagaki et al, 2020).…”
Section: Appendix 3: Triggered Behaviours -Pursuit and Escapementioning
confidence: 94%
“…(anatomy / behaviour) MRN neurons projecting to the thalamus and medulla are separate populations, and activation of the thalamus projectors does not bias movement direction (Inagaki et al, 2020).…”
Section: Midbrain Reticular Nucleus (Mrn)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet there is increasing experimental evidence that covariance is often not stable across tasks. Covariance changes dramatically when cycling forward versus backward (Russo et al, 2018), when using one arm versus another (Ames and Churchland, 2019), when preparing versus moving (Kaufman et al, 2014;Elsayed et al, 2016;Inagaki et al, 2020), when reaching versus walking (Miri et al, 2017), and when co-contracting versus alternating muscle activity (Warriner et al, under review). Thus, in a new task, there is no guarantee the high-variance dimensions will be the same or will show the same correlations with kinematics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%