2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11420-012-9291-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mid-Term Analysis Suggests Ceramic on Ceramic Hip Arthroplasty is Durable with Minimal Wear and Low Risk of Squeak

Abstract: We believe that ceramic-on-ceramic is a safe bearing coupling with excellent survivorship at 10 years.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2,3 Clinical outcomes in the mid to long term for CoC bearings are encouraging, with low rates of revision. 4,5 However, rates of squeaking of between 2% and 21% have been reported. 5,6 Larger diameter fourth generation CoC bearings were introduced to provide more natural biomechanics and increased stability.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2,3 Clinical outcomes in the mid to long term for CoC bearings are encouraging, with low rates of revision. 4,5 However, rates of squeaking of between 2% and 21% have been reported. 5,6 Larger diameter fourth generation CoC bearings were introduced to provide more natural biomechanics and increased stability.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 However, rates of squeaking of between 2% and 21% have been reported. 5,6 Larger diameter fourth generation CoC bearings were introduced to provide more natural biomechanics and increased stability. Nevertheless, rates of squeaking of 12.5% have still been reported with these modern large diameter bearings.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 However, with the recent problems observed with MoM THA, CoC is now considered to be the safer choice with low rates of wear and excellent survival, which in some studies is greater than that of MoP, at ten years and beyond, even in young, high demand patients. [6][7][8][9] In spite of the low rates of wear of both CoC and MoM bearings, there are theoretical advantages to the use of ceramic-on-metal (CoM) bearings. The use of bearing surfaces with different levels of hardness may result in lower rates of wear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They describe 9 revisions, not performed for ceramic-related complications, and conclude that the patients in the series had a good implant survival rate, good function and a low implant wear rate. Same sample and same duration of follow-up have been reported by Molloy et al 17 They reviewed a consecutive series of 301 primary cementless 3rd-generation alumina-on-alumina THAs at a minimum of 10 years follow-up (10% of the patients had died of unrelated cause at the latest follow-up) and demonstrated an overall implant survival rate of 98%, no ceramic fractures, no osteolysis and no failures related to bearing wear, although 0.6% of their hips were revised due to squeaking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%