2018 12th International Conference on Sensing Technology (ICST) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icsenst.2018.8603622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A microstrip resonator based sensor for GHz characterization of in vitro cell culture

Abstract: This contribution describes a sensor for GHz characterization of in vitro cell culture, that overcomes the limitation in high frequency of classical bio-impedance spectroscopy. The sensor we developed enables to monitor a thin layer of approximatively 30µm of cells in their liquid culture medium for a relative permittivity in the range of 5 to 55. Here, we demonstrate the measurement principle using a Finite Element model, which has been validated with experimental response. Our sensor has a minimal sensitivit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…reflection coefficient magnitude, as |S 11 |) provide a spectral response that depends on the composition and concentration of the MUT. Some of the advantages of this technique compared with optical and electrochemical methods are (i) the immediate measurement response when a water sample is in contact with the EM field; (ii) its noninvasiveness, considering this is a field-propagation-based technique (Kölbl et al 2018); (iii) its low power (1 mW) and measurement costs. Some of the disadvantages are related to the capability to detect every minor change in the MUT measurement, such as temperature and density (Al-Kizwini et al 2013).…”
Section: Microwave Technology and Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reflection coefficient magnitude, as |S 11 |) provide a spectral response that depends on the composition and concentration of the MUT. Some of the advantages of this technique compared with optical and electrochemical methods are (i) the immediate measurement response when a water sample is in contact with the EM field; (ii) its noninvasiveness, considering this is a field-propagation-based technique (Kölbl et al 2018); (iii) its low power (1 mW) and measurement costs. Some of the disadvantages are related to the capability to detect every minor change in the MUT measurement, such as temperature and density (Al-Kizwini et al 2013).…”
Section: Microwave Technology and Watermentioning
confidence: 99%