2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A microscopic nonlinear programming approach to shakedown analysis of cohesive–frictional composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Bleyer et al proposed a novel numerical procedure for homogenization of periodic plates, in which kinematic theorem was combined with the prescribed curvatures, and prescribed moments were employed in the static formulation. However, in this paper, we will present a novel computational homogenization limit analysis based on the kinematic approach described in . On the boundary of the RVE, the external prescribed loading condition considered is macroscopic strains, which are treated as variables.…”
Section: Computational Homogenization For Kinematic Limit Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, Bleyer et al proposed a novel numerical procedure for homogenization of periodic plates, in which kinematic theorem was combined with the prescribed curvatures, and prescribed moments were employed in the static formulation. However, in this paper, we will present a novel computational homogenization limit analysis based on the kinematic approach described in . On the boundary of the RVE, the external prescribed loading condition considered is macroscopic strains, which are treated as variables.…”
Section: Computational Homogenization For Kinematic Limit Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The set of macroscopic stresses, which can be carried by the heterogeneous material, characterizes the strength of the homogenized material. In the present study, the kinematic formulation for limit analysis of composite materials will be reformulated in terms of total strain rates (or total velocities), and hence, the resulting formulation is different from those presented in , in which the fluctuation strain rates/velocities are the problem variable fields.…”
Section: Computational Homogenization For Kinematic Limit Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[42], Schwabe [35], Maier [28], Magoariec et al [27], Zhang et al [45], You et al [44], Chen et al [10,11] solve the problem by a static approach. In contrast, Carvelli [6], Chen and Ponter [9], Li [26], and Barrera [3] deal the problem by the kinematic approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%