1955
DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(55)90384-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A microscopic comparison of clinically and artificially produced changes in enamel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1963
1963
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the various methods for in vitro simulation of sub-surface enamel lesions, perhaps the simplest involves applying plain acetate or Iactate buffers partially saturated with calcium and phosphate to enamel surfaces as proposed by earlier investigators (Enright & Friesell 1933, Coolidge et al, 1955, Manson-Hing et al, 1972, While partially saturated buffers of high solvent activity tend to produce either surface erosion or very superficial subsurface lesions in short periods of time, those of lower solvent activities over long periods of time produce subsurface lesions with a preserved surface layer of considerable thickness (10-30 ^m). Under the conditions of this investigation the apparent width of a 5-day lesion was approximately 70-90 ^m with a preserved layer of about lOjtm, Because of the free diffusion of ions in the acid bufTer, all areas of the enamel surface are under comparable acid attack.…”
Section: Natural Vs Experimental Conditions For Inducing Lesions On Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the various methods for in vitro simulation of sub-surface enamel lesions, perhaps the simplest involves applying plain acetate or Iactate buffers partially saturated with calcium and phosphate to enamel surfaces as proposed by earlier investigators (Enright & Friesell 1933, Coolidge et al, 1955, Manson-Hing et al, 1972, While partially saturated buffers of high solvent activity tend to produce either surface erosion or very superficial subsurface lesions in short periods of time, those of lower solvent activities over long periods of time produce subsurface lesions with a preserved surface layer of considerable thickness (10-30 ^m). Under the conditions of this investigation the apparent width of a 5-day lesion was approximately 70-90 ^m with a preserved layer of about lOjtm, Because of the free diffusion of ions in the acid bufTer, all areas of the enamel surface are under comparable acid attack.…”
Section: Natural Vs Experimental Conditions For Inducing Lesions On Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besic [1953] and Coolidge [1955] were the first to investigate the influence of cal cium, phosphate, and acid concentration on the lesion formation. In previous stud ies we determined the mineral content in such artificial lesions as a function of depth [Theuns el al., 1983a-c].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artificially induced WSLs were used to study the remineralization of enamel owing to their histological similarity to natural WSLs. 29,30 The method of production of WSLs was verified by subjecting 10 additional premolars to the demineralizing solution for 96 hours followed by sectioning of the teeth and examination of the sections using PLM. All the sections showed subsurface enamel lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%