2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2019.112717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A micromorphic approach for gradient-enhanced anisotropic ductile damage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the absence of friction ( = 0 or = 0) this reduces to the simple failure condition | | = considered in section 2.1. The scenario whereby tensile failure is active ( < 0) is not considered in this paper but is easily incorporated into the model using the standard approach for opening cracks [21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Mohr-coulomb Failure Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the absence of friction ( = 0 or = 0) this reduces to the simple failure condition | | = considered in section 2.1. The scenario whereby tensile failure is active ( < 0) is not considered in this paper but is easily incorporated into the model using the standard approach for opening cracks [21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Mohr-coulomb Failure Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mathematical modelling of the growth of opening cracks in tension has been widely studied , whereas the growth of non-opening, frictional sliding cracks in compression has received less attention. A range of methods and models have been proposed for modelling brittle and ductile crack opening problems: continuum-based models such as the finite element method (FEM) [2], the extended finite element method (XFEM) [2,4], the phase field method [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], damage models [21][22][23][24][25], the numerical manifold method [26] and the material point erosion method [27]. Closed crack problems for modelling brittle materials in compression range from the finite-discrete element method (FDEM) [28] to damage models [29][30][31][32][33], phase field models [34][35][36][37][38] as well as particle-based models [39][40][41][42] and plasticity models [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth nothing that, from a mathematical view point, the implicit gradient regularization resembles phase-field fracture models as a particular case of averaging equation [12,13]. Non-local damage mechanics via the implicit gradient approach has been mainly implemented in FE by means of a monolithic scheme of the overall problem as pursued in many relevant works that studied the application of such a regularization technique on different types of damage models [14,15]. However, the elevated computational cost of the FE implementation limits the geometrical complexity and the discretization level of the numerical simulations that, in most cases, are restricted to two-dimensional problems [16,17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These changes may be captured by an approach which, by means of related mappings, introduces a fictitious undamaged configuration and which defines a tensorial damage variable, see [17,[41][42][43] amongst others. Research on anisotropic damage formulations is a continuously active area of research, see, e.g., [29,64], to name but a few.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the damage state itself. Another focus lies on the regularisation of anisotropic damage formulations, see, e.g., [1,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%