2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10544-015-9948-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A microfluidic device based on an evaporation-driven micropump

Abstract: In this paper we introduce a microfluidic device ultimately to be applied as a wearable sweat sensor. We show proof-of-principle of the microfluidic functions of the device, namely fluid collection and continuous fluid flow pumping. A filter-paper based layer, that eventually will form the interface between the device and the skin, is used to collect the fluid (e.g., sweat) and enter this into the microfluidic device. A controllable evaporation driven pump is used to drive a continuous fluid flow through a mic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here ∆P represents the material properties (pore size, water potential), whileQ incorporates information about substrate texture and evaporative area (assuming similar environment conditions). [8,11,13,14,16,17,19,[26][27][28] The flow rate obtained from the LMM is comparatively similar to that observed in some other reported passive devices, despite a relatively low suction pressure. However, Figure 5 does not present a complete and fair comparison as some of the examples use device sizes designed for specific applications and not necessarily for assessing the performance limit of their designs (apart from Crawford et al [19]).…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Researchsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Here ∆P represents the material properties (pore size, water potential), whileQ incorporates information about substrate texture and evaporative area (assuming similar environment conditions). [8,11,13,14,16,17,19,[26][27][28] The flow rate obtained from the LMM is comparatively similar to that observed in some other reported passive devices, despite a relatively low suction pressure. However, Figure 5 does not present a complete and fair comparison as some of the examples use device sizes designed for specific applications and not necessarily for assessing the performance limit of their designs (apart from Crawford et al [19]).…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Researchsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The hexagonal arrangement at the pore array drove the uid ow and automatically absorbed liquid through a lter paper interface. 169 Mukhopadhyay et al described a leakage-free PMMA fabricated MFD with microchannel bends with the effect of surface wettability on surface-driven capillary ow. This type of microuidic system was utilized in blood cell separation from whole blood.…”
Section: Capillarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, various methods were developed to enable equipment-free microfluidic pumping, such as capillary- [10][11][12], gas- [13], degas- [14,15], pumping lid- [16], and evaporation-driven [17,18] pumping. These approaches offer simplicity of execution by eliminating the need for an off-chip equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%