16Globally hay is the preferred forage for stabled horses. Variable nutritional and hygienic quality stimulates pre-17 feeding soaking to reduce dust and nutrients to reduce respiratory and metabolic disorders in horses. However, 18 this practice has potential negative impacts on horse health. The objectives of this study were to map the 19 bacterial profile of different hays and determine how soaking alters this with the aim of recommending best 20 practice when feeding fodder to stabled horses. Two meadow and one Perennial Ryegrass hays were soaked for 21 0, 1.5, 9 or 16 hours. Post treatment, hays were analysed for water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) and total 22 aerobic bacteria (TVC), with differences determined using ANOVA and least significant difference. Bacteria 23 were identified via genomic DNA extraction (V3 and V4 variable region of the 16S rRNA gene) and 16S library 24 preparation according to the Illumina protocol. Differences in phyla and family operational taxonomic units 25 within hay types were identified via paired t-tests on the DESeq2 normalised data and false discovery rates 26 accounted for using Padj (P<0.05). Mean WSC losses g/kg DM (+/-SE) increased with soaking time being 30 27 (10.7), 72 (43.7), 80 (38.8) for 1.5, 9 and 16 hours soak respectively. No relationship existed between WSC 28 leaching and bacteria content or profile. Grass type influenced bacterial profiles. Soaking altered the epiphytic 29 bacterial profile across all hays and 9 hours soaking increased richness and Shannon diversity indices.
30Clustering of bacteria was seen between meadow hays which differed from perennial rye grass and this 31 difference increased post soaking. The normal industry practice of soaking hay for 9 hours pre-feeding cannot 32 be recommended as it increases total bacteria content with noted increases of some potential pathogens. The 33 alterations in bacteria profile and hygienic quality may explain why changing fodder or pre-feeding treatments 34 can frequently precipitate colic in horses. 35 36 Acknowledgements 38 Thanks go to Leo Zeef University of Manchester for bioinformatics assistance and Sally Rice and Darren 39 Hawkins for technical help, Royal Agricultural University.40 41 42 Introduction:43 Grass conserved as hay is an ubiquitous fodder used to feed a wide range of livestock and is still the preferred 44 long forage for stabled equids across the world. [1,2] However, especially in temperate climates, it is difficult to 45 make good quality hay that has low dust, bacteria and mould spore counts. Grass conserved as silage or haylage,
46which are fermented forages that require less field-drying time [3] are often suggested as suitable alternatives to 47 hay but in many cases these forages are not an economical or practical solution. Small 15-20 kg bales of haylage 48 are expensive and big bales of 200kg or more need mechanical handling and have a shelf-life of 5 days before 49 aerobic despoliation makes it unsuitable to feed. Moreover, the perceived advantages of haylage as being low in ...