2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A methodology to determine the seismic low-cycle fatigue strength of timber connections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seismic analysis [10,15,21,[30][31][32]47, Connections design [31,98,106,127,129,131,137,149,150,153, Fire performance/fire design [12,14,143,157,163,164,173,176,[182][183][184][185][186][187][188][189][190][191][192][193][194][195][196][197][198][199] Behavior of shear walls, diaphragms, and timber-structural cores [63,71,123,147,149,166,175,[200]…”
Section: Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seismic analysis [10,15,21,[30][31][32]47, Connections design [31,98,106,127,129,131,137,149,150,153, Fire performance/fire design [12,14,143,157,163,164,173,176,[182][183][184][185][186][187][188][189][190][191][192][193][194][195][196][197][198][199] Behavior of shear walls, diaphragms, and timber-structural cores [63,71,123,147,149,166,175,[200]…”
Section: Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of the yield slip defined accordingly, V y,EEEP,m , used for cyclic testing in this campaign is 3 mm for both wood species. Hence the displacement rates on the new draft are yet to be specified, the rates within this campaign were set with reference to Casagrande et al (2020), who have studied the interaction between the strength degradation and the ductility capacity for dowel-type type joints through testing multiple cyclic protocols, employing different displacement rates. The study has provided that by increasing the number of steps, higher accuracy in the results can be achieved.…”
Section: Cyclic Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) two ductility classes, namely -DC2 -(classifiable as moderate dissipative class) and -DC3 -(classifiable as high dissipative class), have been assigned to CLT structures in case of a dissipative structural behaviour 4 ; (ii) specific analytical expressions for the applicability of the capacity-based design both at local-and building-level have been drafted 8 ; (iii) a revised procedure for the determination of the ductility capacity of dissipative connections subjected to cyclic loads has been included 9,10 ; (iv) new values for the ductility demand of dissipative connections have been proposed. 4,8 Firstly, the verification of the behaviour factor q was performed by means of parametric non-linear static (pushover) analyses according to the revised procedure drafted in the "material independent" section of the new Eurocode 8.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the aim to verify if the selected values of the behaviour factors q are consistent with the attained seismic performances of CLT buildings designed in accordance with the new “timber chapter” of Eurocode 8, a novel study for the evaluation of the behaviour factor q is presented in this paper. Unlike from the previous studies, the calculation of the behaviour factor q for CLT buildings has been conducted by selecting archetypes designed according to the provisions drafted in the new Eurocode 8 and, more specifically, taking into account that: two ductility classes, namely – DC2 – (classifiable as moderate dissipative class) and – DC3 – (classifiable as high dissipative class), have been assigned to CLT structures in case of a dissipative structural behaviour 4 ; specific analytical expressions for the applicability of the capacity‐based design both at local‐ and building‐level have been drafted 8 ; a revised procedure for the determination of the ductility capacity of dissipative connections subjected to cyclic loads has been included 9,10 ; new values for the ductility demand of dissipative connections have been proposed 4,8 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation