2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2012.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A methodology to determine the power performance of wave energy converters at a particular coastal location

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
64
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
64
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…where E is the energy outputted by the turbine over a given period of time, T, and P r is the rated power of the turbine [33,34]. …”
Section: Seabed Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where E is the energy outputted by the turbine over a given period of time, T, and P r is the rated power of the turbine [33,34]. …”
Section: Seabed Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, the assessment of the wave energy has been carried out for offshore deep water wave data [1,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], while, more recently, coastal areas have been investigated in order to locate hotspots [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. At the oceanic global scale, the richest wave power areas are between 40 • and 60 • latitude of both hemispheres [10].…”
Section: Assessment Of the Offshore Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors [25][26][27][28][29][30][31] propagated the most significant three or five wave cases representing winter/autumn average condition, a summer/spring average condition and a particularly energetic situation. Other authors [20,22,23,[32][33][34][35][36][37] propagated the whole events in the time series of the offshore numerical model or the offshore wave buoy measurements and estimated the available nearshore wave power. For the Mediterranean nearshore, the wave power in the western side of Sicily has been estimated to be close to 8 kW/m by Iuppa et al [23] and 5 kW/m by Monteforte et al [32].…”
Section: Assessment Of the Nearshore Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key steps in the optimization process are the geometry tuning procedure and the Power Take Off control [27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. However, after that, a production efficiency-based design is proposed; a second stage of design for Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability (RAM) is required [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%