2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A methodology for the selection of Material Handling Equipment in manufacturing systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not obvious to understand why certain criteria are retained and others ignored. An analysis of literature on MHE [18] revealed that more than 200 criteria were identified for MHE selection processes. While in the field studies of this work, 12 distinct criteria were identified, and the companies used at most 6 criteria to decide.…”
Section: Mhs Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is not obvious to understand why certain criteria are retained and others ignored. An analysis of literature on MHE [18] revealed that more than 200 criteria were identified for MHE selection processes. While in the field studies of this work, 12 distinct criteria were identified, and the companies used at most 6 criteria to decide.…”
Section: Mhs Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in the field studies of this work, 12 distinct criteria were identified, and the companies used at most 6 criteria to decide. In [18], a methodology with a list of potential criteria is presented for two analysis levels: MHE category selection and MHE model selection. To advance the field it would be relevant to propose techniques for the selection of relevant criteria, based on the company's characteristics and its industrial activity and strategy.…”
Section: Mhs Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differing designs were evaluated and the results were validated both numerically and experimentally [20]. The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) was used for selection of material handling equipment [21]. Moreover, it was used in combination with Pugh Matrix methods for the comparison of concept designs of reconfigurable manufacturing systems, but very few details were provided [22].…”
Section: State Of the Art 21 Design Proceedures In The Manufacturing ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goswami and Behera (2021) made an investigation for the capability and applicability of two well-known MCDM approaches ARAS and COPRAS for the evaluation and selection of conveyors, AGV and robots as material handling equipment. Soufi et al (2021) introduced an AHP based MCDM methodology for the evaluation and selection of material handling equipment to be utilized in manufacturing systems. Satyam et al (2021) applied a multi attribute decision making approach for evaluation and selection of conveyors as material handling equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%