2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-019-05309-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Methodology for Predicting Surface Crack Nucleation in Additively Manufactured Metallic Components

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AR: aspect ratio (must be ≥ 1, where 1 indicates a perfect circle) of the ellipse that approximates the defect, i.e. AR= a b (3) where, b, is the semi-minor axis, and, a, is the semi-major axis of the ellipse. Jag, J: represents the jaggedness of the defect and is defined in terms of the ratio between the perimeter (Perim) of the defect and that of a classical ellipse approximated by:…”
Section: Characterising the Critical Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…AR: aspect ratio (must be ≥ 1, where 1 indicates a perfect circle) of the ellipse that approximates the defect, i.e. AR= a b (3) where, b, is the semi-minor axis, and, a, is the semi-major axis of the ellipse. Jag, J: represents the jaggedness of the defect and is defined in terms of the ratio between the perimeter (Perim) of the defect and that of a classical ellipse approximated by:…”
Section: Characterising the Critical Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, the defect population characteristics, microstructural anisotropy, complex residual stress, and surface roughness of AM processed metals [2] can all contribute to the scatter in their high cycle fatigue (HCF) performance. In practice, the residual stresses can be mitigated and an acceptable surface finish can be achieved, by a proper combination of preheating, post-AM heat treatment, peening, vibratory grinding and/or micro machining [3] . Furthermore, the fatigue resistance of AM processed metals has generally been found to be more sensitive to the intrinsic manufacturing defects than the underlying microstructural inhomogeneity [4] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is well known, surface roughness is one of the important surface conditions determining the fatigue performance of engineering materials [ 12 , 13 ]. In other words, high surface roughness will feature height peaks and deep valleys, which are potential stress concentration zones resulting in crack formation and consequent propagation [ 14 , 15 ]. Therefore, it is important to reduce the surface roughness of the parts manufactured by PBF, especially for applications in need of long fatigue life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On closer inspection of their stress‐life (S‐N) graphs it can be clearly seen that surface machining alone has a greater improvement than HIPping alone, but when both operations were performed the improvement was greater than might be assumed from summing the improvements from the two individual effects. In another example, Chan and Peralta‐Duran 21 consider fatigue in AM parts, and use an analytical model to treat surface notches as fatigue crack nucleation sites. Their measured fatigue life results for as‐built AM parts do not seem to follow the trend lines of their predictions, whereas the equivalent results for surface machined (SM) AM parts do.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%