1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1987.tb01505.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Methodology for Labor Scheduling in a Service Operating System

Abstract: In the increasingly competitive services sector, utilization of the labor force can make the difference between profits or losses. Until recently, service operations managers had a limited set of tools, most of them computer-based, for scheduling labor. This paper offers a manual heuristic for labor scheduling that outperforms traditional algorithmic solution approaches.Specifically, this study examines the problem of scheduling employees in service delivery systems subject to demand variability. The manual he… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Research exploring the scheduling decisions is a widely studied area in the overall workforce management literature. In general, most scheduling research can be classified into three areas: shift scheduling (Buffa, Cosgrove, & Luce, 1976; Henderson & Berry, 1976; Thompson, 1990; Thompson, 1995a; Mason et al, 1998), days‐off scheduling (Tibrewala, Philippe, & Browne, 1972; Baker, 1974; Bechtold, 1981), and tour scheduling (Mabert & Watts, 1982; Bechtold & Showalter, 1987; Easton & Rossin, 1991a, 1991b; Jarrah, Bard, & deSilva, 1994). A smaller amount of research can be classified as tour assignment (Ritzman, Krajewski, & Showalter, 1976; Love & Hoey, 1990; Loucks & Jacobs, 1991).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research exploring the scheduling decisions is a widely studied area in the overall workforce management literature. In general, most scheduling research can be classified into three areas: shift scheduling (Buffa, Cosgrove, & Luce, 1976; Henderson & Berry, 1976; Thompson, 1990; Thompson, 1995a; Mason et al, 1998), days‐off scheduling (Tibrewala, Philippe, & Browne, 1972; Baker, 1974; Bechtold, 1981), and tour scheduling (Mabert & Watts, 1982; Bechtold & Showalter, 1987; Easton & Rossin, 1991a, 1991b; Jarrah, Bard, & deSilva, 1994). A smaller amount of research can be classified as tour assignment (Ritzman, Krajewski, & Showalter, 1976; Love & Hoey, 1990; Loucks & Jacobs, 1991).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) mean labor requirement [15] [16], (2) labor requirement amplitude [4] [7], (3) length of the operational day [4] [7], and (4) the shape of the labor requirements distribution [4] Although of sporadic quality and limited quantity, we believe that the relevant literature suggests the following: (1) the use of certain scheduling flexibility alternatives (e.g., meal-break flexibility [ 11, start-time float [2] 11 [29]. Accordingly, four sets of hypotheses were formulated regarding the presumed labor utilization effects of the scheduling flexibility and labor requirement characteristics studied: H 1 : Each labor scheduling flexibility and labor requirement characteristic effect will be significant for each labor requirement distribution.…”
Section: Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) mean labor requirement [15] [16], (2) labor requirement amplitude [4] [7], (3) length of the operational day [4] [7], and (4) the shape of the labor requirements distribution [4] [5] [lo] [22] [26] [29].…”
Section: Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As pointed out in [6], "Demand for services exhibits a variety of different within-/between-day patterns depending on the service organization . .…”
Section: Labor-scheduling Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%