1998
DOI: 10.2307/3004010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A methodology for identifying married couples in medicare data: Mortality, morbidity, and health care use among the married elderly

Abstract: We describe a method for the development of cohorts of up to three quarters of the 14 million married couples aged 65 and over in the United States. The health care experiences, illness histories, and mortality of these identified couples can be assessed longitudinally using Medicare data. We summarize strengths and limitations of using data from Medicare administrative records for the study of marriage, health, and aging. We illustrate the method by demonstrating substantial differences in survival in a cohor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(20, 21) Married couples in the 1993 Medicare Denominator file, which contains 96% of all elderly Americans,(22) were identified using a published detection algorithm. (23) In order to satisfy computer hardware constraints we drew an 8% simple random sample from the pool of all identified married couples, which we further restricted to those couples in which both spouses were either white or black, aged 67–98 at baseline, not enrolled in an HMO, living in the 50 states or D.C., and sharing the same zip code (to exclude married but separated couples). The final sample contains 373,189 married couples, or 746,378 men and women.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(20, 21) Married couples in the 1993 Medicare Denominator file, which contains 96% of all elderly Americans,(22) were identified using a published detection algorithm. (23) In order to satisfy computer hardware constraints we drew an 8% simple random sample from the pool of all identified married couples, which we further restricted to those couples in which both spouses were either white or black, aged 67–98 at baseline, not enrolled in an HMO, living in the 50 states or D.C., and sharing the same zip code (to exclude married but separated couples). The final sample contains 373,189 married couples, or 746,378 men and women.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first step of data development, Medicare beneficiaries older than 65 years on January 1, 1993, in the Denominator File were identified. Among the 32,180,588 elderly in this file, we estimate, based on Census statistics, that there are 6.6 million currently married heterosexual couples where both members are 65 years and older, of which we detected 5,496,444 (Iwashyna, Brennan, Zhang, & Christakis, 2002;Iwashyna et al, 1998). Since individuals typically enter Medicare at age 65 years, we restricted the analysis to couples where both partners were older than 67 years at baseline in order to guarantee the availability of a full two years of health background controls for the entire sample.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Medicare databases are uniquely suited for research on contextual variation in the widowhood effect as they provide prospective information for over 96% of elderly Americans (whether they used health care or not) with daily mortality follow-up (Hatten, 1980), permit (with some constraints) the identification of both spouses of elderly married couples (Iwashyna, Zhang, Lauderdale, & Christakis, 1998), contain detailed physician-ascertained medical information to control for baseline differences in morbidity, and identify the place of residence of all participants, thus permitting extensive record linkage for contextual features of the residential environment. In the first step of data development, Medicare beneficiaries older than 65 years on January 1, 1993, in the Denominator File were identified.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other factors, for example, patients' marital status, geographic location, and socioeconomic status, may be possible prognostic factors for patients with advanced cancers. 20 Various environmental considerations 21 were considered as possible prognostic factors for these patients. Based on these prognostic factors, prognostic tools were developed for cancer patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%