2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-9236(01)00115-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A methodology for controlled empirical investigation of membership continuity and change in GDSS groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Investigating creative design teams, Choi and Thompson (2005) point out that most studies (Rogers et al 1961, Goodman and Leyden 1991, Pisano et al 2001, Mathiyalakan 2002) report negative effects of membership change on team performance because they focus on task co-ordination. Building on Ziller's (Ziller et al 1961, 1962, Ziller 1965 research, Choi and Thompson (2005) investigate the effects of membership change on the performance of creative teams, and report that the reduction in level of team familiarity may have a positive impact on the team's performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigating creative design teams, Choi and Thompson (2005) point out that most studies (Rogers et al 1961, Goodman and Leyden 1991, Pisano et al 2001, Mathiyalakan 2002) report negative effects of membership change on team performance because they focus on task co-ordination. Building on Ziller's (Ziller et al 1961, 1962, Ziller 1965 research, Choi and Thompson (2005) investigate the effects of membership change on the performance of creative teams, and report that the reduction in level of team familiarity may have a positive impact on the team's performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vote on the MAS member is a game. Agents don't know each other contents of the voting, independent with the last game, their condition and other information known to the whole system, to make a favorable judgment [15,16].…”
Section: Mas Decision Rules For Members In the Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental work on the effects of finite membership changes in teams has been mixed. Some studies have indicated that changes in membership are disruptive, decrease productivity and increase the time it takes to solve problems (Ancona & Caldwell, 1998; Goodman & Leyden, 1991; Mathiyalakan, 2002). Conversely, others have suggested that under some circumstances, membership changes could be advantageous (Choi & Thompson, 1995; Guzzo & Dickson, 1996).…”
Section: Studying Changes In Group Composition Over Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In several areas of research, most notably in industrial/organizational psychology (IOP) and in addictions treatment research, there have been calls for advances in modeling the impact of turnover in membership among dynamic groups. In IOP, group dynamics researchers have theorized about the impact of turnover, but the empirical work centers primarily on finite (i.e., one-time changes in group membership) manipulations of group changes (Ancona & Caldwell, 1998; Goodman & Leyden, 1991; Mathiyalakan, 2002). Among group therapy researchers, the dearth of approaches to modeling turnover in treatment group membership under “ecologically valid” treatment protocols (i.e., continual addition and removal of treatment group members) has forced investigators to conduct research on treatment protocols that are inconsistent with the way treatment is conducted in community settings (i.e., individual therapies, closed enrollment groups; Morgan-Lopez & Fals-Stewart, 2006).…”
Section: Motivation For the Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%