2019
DOI: 10.1115/1.4042518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Methodology Based on Structural Finite Element Method-Boundary Element Method and Acoustic Boundary Element Method Models in 2.5D for the Prediction of Reradiated Noise in Railway-Induced Ground-Borne Vibration Problems

Abstract: This work is focused on the analysis of noise and vibration generated in underground railway tunnels due to train traffic. Specifically, an analysis of noise and vibration generated by train passage in an underground simple tunnel in a homogeneous full-space is presented. In this methodology, a two-and-a-half-dimensional coupled finite element and boundary element method (2.5D FEM-BEM) is used to model soil–structure interaction problems. The noise analysis inside the tunnel is performed using a 2.5D acoustic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the problem cross-section is assumed invariant, the so-called 2.5D technique is used in order to obtain the 3D response of the problem in an efficient manner [8]. This concept has been explored using the finite element method (FEM) [9][10][11], the boundary element method [12][13][14], and the Method of Fundamental Solutions (MFS) [15]. If the problem requires the simulation of complex geometries, FEM is typically the preferred method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the problem cross-section is assumed invariant, the so-called 2.5D technique is used in order to obtain the 3D response of the problem in an efficient manner [8]. This concept has been explored using the finite element method (FEM) [9][10][11], the boundary element method [12][13][14], and the Method of Fundamental Solutions (MFS) [15]. If the problem requires the simulation of complex geometries, FEM is typically the preferred method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it requires coupling with an absorbing condition to prevent spurious reflections contaminating the solution. This can be done by coupling with an alternative modelling approach [13][14][15][16][17] such as the boundary element method. Alternatively, rather than use multiple different approaches, an absorbing boundary condition can be used purely within the FE approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the computation of matrix Hbf requires a model able to simulate not only the ground but also the building structure, it is interesting to combine different numerical methods in order to achieve accuracy and versatility [5,15,16]., or, alternatively, to use FEM-PML approach [4].…”
Section: Stepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, analytical models are usually devoted for the prediction of vibrations in free-field and their application is limited for simple geometries [3]. Therefore, numerical approaches can be faced as the method of choice when versatility is a requirement, allowing the inclusion of whole system, from the source to the building, including re-radiated noise prediction [4,5] In the scope of numerical approach, Fiala et al [6] used a decoupled approach to assess the vibration response of the building. This approach considers a weak coupling between the tunnel/soil and the building/soil systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation