<p>Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung Vol. 40 2015
DOI: 10.12759/hsr.40.2015.3.48-78
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Methodological Framework for Measuring Social Innovation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholarly debates therefore mainly revolve around questions of methodological approaches [67,68]. Measurement methods are supposed to follow scientific methods and standards.…”
Section: Conceptual Approaches-social Innovation Social Enterprise Em...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholarly debates therefore mainly revolve around questions of methodological approaches [67,68]. Measurement methods are supposed to follow scientific methods and standards.…”
Section: Conceptual Approaches-social Innovation Social Enterprise Em...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this point of view, the development of indicators, metrics, and tools to assess the impact of SI poses the scientific community a new challenge, not only related to that development but also regarding the complexity of selecting criteria for gathering indicators of different types, forms and sources (Bund et al, 2015). Yet, despite the complexity of this task, there is a strong demand from policy-making and organizations regarding the development of indicators to measure the impact of SI initiatives, which configures, clearly, a gap in the current literature around SI (Spila et al, 2016).…”
Section: Literature Review On Social Innovation Impact Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, despite the complexity of this task, there is a strong demand from policy-making and organizations regarding the development of indicators to measure the impact of SI initiatives, which configures, clearly, a gap in the current literature around SI (Spila et al, 2016). The identified gap can be justified for different aspects, such as lack of consensus on what SI is about, difficulties to address the appropriate methodologies to select indicators and their metrics, and which organizations should be assessed, among others (see, for example, Antadze & Westley, 2012a;Bund et al, 2015;Spila et al, 2016;Vilarinho et al, 2018). In this context, the identification of indicators and the development of metrics for SI impact assessment must be capable to collect and make available data at various dimensions where SI may occur, for instance, social, geographical, cultural, political, economic, educational and environmental.…”
Section: Literature Review On Social Innovation Impact Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The construction of innovation, irrespective of the type, is always socially and culturally embedded. According to Bund et al (2015), the idea that particular social innovations are embedded in a specific society and culture is especially pronounced in the very concept of a social innovation, defined in terms of modifications that occur in the social and economic environment (because of the innovation). When the required social embedding of all innovations is emphasised, there is a risk that the distinction between traditional technological innovation, business innovation and social innovation is lost.…”
Section: Investigating Social Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%