2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.10.17.20214304
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Methodological Checklist for fMRI Drug Cue Reactivity Studies: Development and Expert Consensus

Abstract: Background: Cue reactivity is one of the most frequently used paradigms in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of substance use disorders (SUDs). Although there have been many promising results elucidating the neurocognitive mechanisms of SUDs and SUD treatments, heterogeneities in participant characteristics, task design, craving assessment, scanning preparation and analysis decisions limit rigor and reproducibility in the field of fMRI of drug cue reactivity (FDCR), hampering clinical transl… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 171 publications
(294 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this preregistration, researchers have provided details on the methods and analysis for this fMRI‐based outcome measure, however, there are still details needed to increase the replicability of the outcome measure such as task version, task analysis contrast, and many details in the preprocessing, ROI definition and data analysis pipeline. We believe that higher level of reproducibility could be facilitated with a detailed checklist that should be developed in a consensus process (Ekhtiari, et al., 2020). It is true that clinicaltrial.gov website is not technically designed to provide, encourage or fully support this checklist, however, we should mention that there is still an available space in the clinicaltrial.gov website for each trial to provide detailed descriptions up to 32,000 characters, and also there is a possibility for uploading additional documents for preregistration including structured checklists for methodological details.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this preregistration, researchers have provided details on the methods and analysis for this fMRI‐based outcome measure, however, there are still details needed to increase the replicability of the outcome measure such as task version, task analysis contrast, and many details in the preprocessing, ROI definition and data analysis pipeline. We believe that higher level of reproducibility could be facilitated with a detailed checklist that should be developed in a consensus process (Ekhtiari, et al., 2020). It is true that clinicaltrial.gov website is not technically designed to provide, encourage or fully support this checklist, however, we should mention that there is still an available space in the clinicaltrial.gov website for each trial to provide detailed descriptions up to 32,000 characters, and also there is a possibility for uploading additional documents for preregistration including structured checklists for methodological details.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there is a large gap in harmonized collective efforts with shared fMRI protocols and study designs to help accumulate replicable knowledge in the field over time. Meanwhile, there is a growing effort in the neuroimaging community to develop domain‐specific and domain‐general checklists for better quality reporting of fMRI studies (Ekhtiari et al., 2020). We hope this systematic review and its recommendations will help to move one step forward for this endeavor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are adopting the ENIGMA Addiction Cue Reactivity (ACRI) Checklist ( Ekhtiari et al, 2020 ) in our reporting and have added the checklist as supplementary material to highlight where items are addressed in the main body of text.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our trial was pre-registered and designed to investigate neuronal networks in alcoholism, which included analyses of structural and functional connectivity, as well as alcohol cue-induced brain responses (clinical trials id DRKS00003357). Methodological details of the presented alcohol cue-reactivity fMRI study are reported following the recommendations of a recently published ENIGMA consensus paper [13]. Overall, a total of n = 55 abstinent treatment-seeking male patients (100% male) with alcohol dependence were enrolled of whom n = 45 patients with complete follow-up and fMRI baseline data were included in current analyses (n = 5 patients had to be excluded due to fMRI artifacts or due to a different fMRI task version and n = 5 additional patients had to be excluded due to loss to follow-up, because of refusal to continue study procedures)(see Fig.…”
Section: Study Design and Patient Samplementioning
confidence: 99%