2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2018.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A methodological approach to classify typical and atypical pigment network patterns for melanoma diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, these features were classified using an SVM. Pathan et al [134] proposed a detection system for pigment networks and differentiated between typical and atypical network patterns. In [135], laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy was used with a combination of statistical methods to distinguish between the soft tissue of the skin.…”
Section: Traditional Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, these features were classified using an SVM. Pathan et al [134] proposed a detection system for pigment networks and differentiated between typical and atypical network patterns. In [135], laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy was used with a combination of statistical methods to distinguish between the soft tissue of the skin.…”
Section: Traditional Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, another group of researchers applied segmentation methods to discard background and unneeded features [12]. In fact, the procedures of segmentation and classification are based on low-level features with low discrimination capabilities which led to bad results [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differently, segmentation is adopted to isolate the foreground elements from the background ones [ 6 ]. Consequently, the segmentation includes low-level features with a low representational power that provides unsatisfactory results [ 7 ]. In recent years, deep learning has become an effective solution for the extraction of significant features on large data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%