Abstract:The selection of the voices that make up a qualitative research project is of great importance since the knowledge gained about a certain object of study depends on it. Qualitative researchers focus on the voices around which the purposes of their research explicitly revolve. However, they do not customarily pay attention to peripheral voices, which are primordial to understanding the complexity of the phenomenon studied. In this article, we fill in the literature gap regarding the inclusion of peripheral voic… Show more
“…Peripheral voices' narratives thus become useful to better understand central voices' narratives and the context in which they are produced. Regarding justice in healthcare organizations, the inclusion of peripheral voices in research is of great interest since the construction of fair environments depends not only on those who experience injustice the most but also on those who contribute with their actions or inactions to shape these experiences (López‐Deflory, Perron, et al, 2022). These peripheral participants were split into two profiles: (1) physicians in clinical practice and (2) healthcare organization managers.…”
Nurses have their own ways of talking about their experiences of injustice in healthcare organizations. The aim of this article is to describe how nurses talk about their work‐life experiences and discuss the discursive effects that arise from nurses' use of language regarding their political agency. To this end, we present the findings garnered from a study focused on exploring how nurses deploy their political agency to project their idea of social and political justice in public healthcare organizations and how they face the challenges and uncertainties of (re)thinking their institutional order when it does not resonate with their professional ethos. We then discuss the implications that nurses' use of language has in relation to their ability to deploy their political agency to oppose the forms of injustice they face in their daily practice. We conclude by stating that careful attention should be placed on understanding the discursive implications of nurses' use of language on their individual and collective emancipation in healthcare organizations.
“…Peripheral voices' narratives thus become useful to better understand central voices' narratives and the context in which they are produced. Regarding justice in healthcare organizations, the inclusion of peripheral voices in research is of great interest since the construction of fair environments depends not only on those who experience injustice the most but also on those who contribute with their actions or inactions to shape these experiences (López‐Deflory, Perron, et al, 2022). These peripheral participants were split into two profiles: (1) physicians in clinical practice and (2) healthcare organization managers.…”
Nurses have their own ways of talking about their experiences of injustice in healthcare organizations. The aim of this article is to describe how nurses talk about their work‐life experiences and discuss the discursive effects that arise from nurses' use of language regarding their political agency. To this end, we present the findings garnered from a study focused on exploring how nurses deploy their political agency to project their idea of social and political justice in public healthcare organizations and how they face the challenges and uncertainties of (re)thinking their institutional order when it does not resonate with their professional ethos. We then discuss the implications that nurses' use of language has in relation to their ability to deploy their political agency to oppose the forms of injustice they face in their daily practice. We conclude by stating that careful attention should be placed on understanding the discursive implications of nurses' use of language on their individual and collective emancipation in healthcare organizations.
“…This study was conducted in Mallorca (Spain). Participants in this research included central and peripheral voices (López-Deflory et al, 2022). Care nurses in clinical practice, nurses in middle management positions, nurse managers, and nurses in mixed positions (between care and management) within public healthcare organizations, as well as nurses in political, collegiate, or union positions were included as the central voices of the study.…”
Critical discourse analysis is a set of theoretical and methodological devices used to analyze and challenge how we construct reality by looking for meaning behind words. The process of conducting critical discourse analysis is complex and, in the field of nursing research, is often carried out without regarding the different dimensions entwined in discourse. In this vein, the dimension that concerns the linguistic characteristics of texts is a highly informative one, but all too often left out of study results by researchers in nursing. This article aims to present some methodological notes of our experience conducting an analysis of linguistic characteristics within a critical discourse analysis doctoral research. We discuss the theoretical and methodological reasons why these characteristics should be widely recognized as a fundamental dimension in the framework of critical discourse analysis. We propose general recommendations to make this dimension of analysis more easily accessible and encourage other critical researchers to include the analysis of linguistic characteristics of texts in their research.
“…The interpretive nature of qualitative research stimulates methodological questions about how researchers can incorporate reflexive praxis during data analysis: among others, becoming aware of their own and how it affects both the interpretative process and the representation of voice for others (N. Brown, 2019; Leavy, 2015; López-Deflory et al, 2022). Research methodologists suggest that the arts open new possibilities in research through the very nature of the arts to stimulate and evoke perspectives.…”
Qualitative researchers continue to push methodological boundaries to study social phenomena using arts-based practices. Research methodologists suggest that the arts open new possibilities in research through the very nature of the arts to stimulate and evoke perspectives. The arts promote dialogue, which yields new insights, highlights multiple meanings, and questions norm-based traditions. This article presents findings from a duo-ethnography to explore the application of the arts as a dialogic-reflexive process during the data analysis phase in qualitative research. Findings contribute with insights into how science and culture are combined methodologically to facilitate dialogic-reflexivity in research and meaning-making.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.