2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2011.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A methodological analysis for the assessment of non-covalent π interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(49 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21 In some weak interactions dominated by dispersion effects like p-p stacking the MP2 method tends to overestimate the interaction energy, however it has been demonstrated that the dispersion term in ion-p interactions is small compared to electrostatic and induction terms, which dominate the interaction. 10 In addition, we have recently demonstrated 22 that the RI-MP2 method provides interaction energies for ion-p complexes, in good agreement with benchmark CCSD(T) results. For the C + -p complex 3, a stationary point is not found and it converges to complex 5.…”
Section: Theoretical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…21 In some weak interactions dominated by dispersion effects like p-p stacking the MP2 method tends to overestimate the interaction energy, however it has been demonstrated that the dispersion term in ion-p interactions is small compared to electrostatic and induction terms, which dominate the interaction. 10 In addition, we have recently demonstrated 22 that the RI-MP2 method provides interaction energies for ion-p complexes, in good agreement with benchmark CCSD(T) results. For the C + -p complex 3, a stationary point is not found and it converges to complex 5.…”
Section: Theoretical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The RI-MP2 method [57,58] applied to the study of cation-p and anion-p interactions is considerably faster than the MP2, and the interaction energies and equilibrium distances are almost identical for both methods [59,60]. We and others have recently demonstrated that this level of theory gives comparable results to the CCSD(T)/AVTZ//RI-MP2/aug-ccpVQZ level for several anion-p complexes [61,62]. The binding energy (E) was calculated at the same level with correction for the basis set superposition error (BSSE) using the counterpoise method [63].…”
Section: Theoretical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…30 We have recently demonstrated that this level of theory gives comparable results to the CCSD(T)/AVTZ//RI-MP2/aug-cc-pVQZ level for anion-p complexes of pyrazine. 31 To analyze the inter-molecular interactions, the atoms-in-molecules (AIM) theory was employed. 32 AIM is based upon those critical points where the gradient of the density, +r, vanishes.…”
Section: Theoretical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%