2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-8141(02)00126-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method to test reliability and accuracy of the decomposition of multi-channel long-term intramuscular EMG signal recordings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fifteen percent of the MUAPs of the 15 MU pairs were affected by observed variations in amplitude of the same MU (±28% of the maximum peak-to-peak amplitude). Similar results were found in a previous study (Zennaro et al 2002), where amplitude modulations in long-term recordings (10 min long) of more than ±30% of the maximum peak-to-peak amplitude were observed. Although slow shape changes over time are correctly detected by the tracking algorithm, abrupt changes are often misclassified as newly recruited MUs.…”
Section: Accuracy Of the Decomposition Results (Concurrently Active Mus)supporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Fifteen percent of the MUAPs of the 15 MU pairs were affected by observed variations in amplitude of the same MU (±28% of the maximum peak-to-peak amplitude). Similar results were found in a previous study (Zennaro et al 2002), where amplitude modulations in long-term recordings (10 min long) of more than ±30% of the maximum peak-to-peak amplitude were observed. Although slow shape changes over time are correctly detected by the tracking algorithm, abrupt changes are often misclassified as newly recruited MUs.…”
Section: Accuracy Of the Decomposition Results (Concurrently Active Mus)supporting
confidence: 92%
“…To test the accuracy of the decomposition program, artificially generated signals with known features were used as a reference (Zennaro et al 2002). For details on the procedure for obtaining artificially generated intramuscular EMG signals, refer to Farina et al (2001).…”
Section: Methods To Test Accuracy and Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most of the clustering techniques developed for EMG decomposition are based on adaptations of general clustering algorithms such as the nearest-neighbor [1], [26], [53], [115], single linkage [54], [55], [91], [93], [94], [116], [117], K-means [1], [7], [26], [68], [74], fuzzy c-means [66], [67], [118], minimal spanning tree [54][55][56], [59], [65], [69], [119], [120], leader-based clustering [6], [25], and self-organizing neural nets algorithm [58]. In many of these algorithms MU firing pattern information is used passively or actively along with MUP shape information to assign an individual MUP to the correct train.…”
Section: Clustering and Supervised Classification Of Detected Mupsmentioning
confidence: 99%