2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method to produce evolving functional connectivity maps during the course of an fMRI experiment using wavelet-based time-varying Granger causality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
89
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
89
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of SMA on M1 has been consistently confirmed by many effective connectivity measurements such as Granger causality analysis (Chen et al, 2009;Gao et al, 2008Gao et al, , 2011Sato et al, 2006), structural equation modeling (Solodkin et al, 2004), and dynamic causal modeling (DCM) (Grefkes et al, 2008). These results demonstrated a predominantly facilitatory function of the SMA in the top-down processes during motor execution (Arai et al, 2012;Gao et al, 2011;Grefkes et al, 2008), and implied that ipsilateral and contralateral SMAs played different roles on contralateral M1 (Gao et al, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The influence of SMA on M1 has been consistently confirmed by many effective connectivity measurements such as Granger causality analysis (Chen et al, 2009;Gao et al, 2008Gao et al, , 2011Sato et al, 2006), structural equation modeling (Solodkin et al, 2004), and dynamic causal modeling (DCM) (Grefkes et al, 2008). These results demonstrated a predominantly facilitatory function of the SMA in the top-down processes during motor execution (Arai et al, 2012;Gao et al, 2011;Grefkes et al, 2008), and implied that ipsilateral and contralateral SMAs played different roles on contralateral M1 (Gao et al, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This argument is the conceptual basis of Granger Causality [1,2] which is probably the most prominent method to estimate the direction of causal influence in time series analysis. Granger Causality was originally developed in econometry, but is applied to many different problems in physics, geosciences (cause of climate change), social sciences, and biology with special emphasis on neural system [3,4,5,6,7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the choice between GCA and model-based method like DCM is currently debated in literature (David, 2009), (Roebroeck et al, 2009), at the state of art no theoretical reasons exist to exclude the effectiveness of GCA analysis to infer connectivity on BOLD signal (Roebroeck et al, 2009). GCA approach was indeed successfully applied to fMRI data for studying brain connectivity during cognitive (Roebroeck et al, 2005), (Demirci et al, 2009), (Sato et al, 2010), (Ide et al, 2011), (Shippers et al, 2011, (Seger et al, 2011), sensory , (Stilla et al, 2007), , (Havlicek et al, 2010), and motor tasks (Abler et al, 2006), (Sato et al, 2006), (Chen et al, 2009) and for investigating resting-state networks, (Liao et al, 2011), (Jiao et al, 2011) and in pathological conditions like epilepsy (Tana et al, submitted). One of the methodology more widely used to calculate Granger causality are is based on multivariate autoregressive models which are fitted to the signals (EEG or BOLD) of interest.…”
Section: Data-driven Effective Connectivity: Granger Causality Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%