2013
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2011.644540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method to minimise error in 2D-DLT reconstruction of non-planar markers filmed with a moving camera

Abstract: This article describes a method that allows estimating, with the 2D version of the direct linear transformation (DLT), the actual 2D coordinates of a point when the latter is not strictly in the calibration plane. Markers placed in vertical line, above, below and in the centre of a horizontal calibration plane were filmed by a moving camera. Without correction, strong errors (up to 64.5%) were noticed for markers out of the calibration plane. After correction, calculated coordinates were consistent with actual… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Radiographic images were saved in DICOM format and postprocessed using Matlab software (MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA). After the application of a two-dimensional direct linear transformation to correct image distortion (22), the coordinates of the centroid of each radio-opaque skin marker were automatically identified and used to determine skin-based, noncontact radiographic measures of foot mobility. For skin-based radiographic measures of foot mobility, dorsal arch height was defined as the distance of the dorsal foot marker to the support surface, whereas midfoot width was defined as the distance between medial and lateral foot markers (1,4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiographic images were saved in DICOM format and postprocessed using Matlab software (MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA). After the application of a two-dimensional direct linear transformation to correct image distortion (22), the coordinates of the centroid of each radio-opaque skin marker were automatically identified and used to determine skin-based, noncontact radiographic measures of foot mobility. For skin-based radiographic measures of foot mobility, dorsal arch height was defined as the distance of the dorsal foot marker to the support surface, whereas midfoot width was defined as the distance between medial and lateral foot markers (1,4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%