2014
DOI: 10.5194/os-10-845-2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method to generate fully multi-scale optimal interpolation by combining efficient single process analyses, illustrated by a DINEOF analysis spiced with a local optimal interpolation

Abstract: Abstract. We present a method in which the optimal interpolation of multi-scale processes can be expanded into a succession of simpler interpolations. First, we prove how the optimal analysis of a superposition of two processes can be obtained by different mathematical formulations involving iterations and analysis focusing on a single process. From the different mathematical equivalent formulations, we then select the most efficient ones by analyzing the behavior of the different possibilities in a simple and… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, this distance reaches values of 5 km after 24 h in the case of OMA. The values of D obtained in our computations after 24 h of simulation are smaller than those reported in Molcard et al (2009), Bellomo et al (2015) and Kalampokis et al (2016) for separation distances between real and virtual drifter trajectories. It is important to keep in mind that in these experiments the trajectories are calculated with data from different sources (HFR and drifters) and different samples (spatial resolution), which are collected in a different region (Mediterranean Sea).…”
Section: Comparison Of Trajectoriescontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, this distance reaches values of 5 km after 24 h in the case of OMA. The values of D obtained in our computations after 24 h of simulation are smaller than those reported in Molcard et al (2009), Bellomo et al (2015) and Kalampokis et al (2016) for separation distances between real and virtual drifter trajectories. It is important to keep in mind that in these experiments the trajectories are calculated with data from different sources (HFR and drifters) and different samples (spatial resolution), which are collected in a different region (Mediterranean Sea).…”
Section: Comparison Of Trajectoriescontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Over the last 20-25 years there has been a rapid growth in the use of coastal radars, demonstrating the possibility of observing and monitoring complex surface current dynamics and leading to a fast spread of installations of HFR observatories in many coastal regions. Currently, HFR is a unique technology able to provide autonomously continuous hourly surface velocity measurements over wide coastal areas (typical range of 30-100 km from the coast) at high spatial (a few kilometers) resolution depending on the working frequency (Paduan and Washburn, 2013;Bellomo et al, 2015;Lana et al, 2016;Rubio et al, 2017). Contrary to satellite altimetry, the use of HFR data can potentially provide gridded velocities with the necessary resolution in both space and time to unravel the role of small scales on dynamical properties (Hernández-Carrasco et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 The training process of DINCAE is based on OI, which aims to minimize the analysis error (i.e., between the estimated and observed values). The basic OI approach can be found in the previous studies [25,54,55]. DINCAE estimates the anomaly of SST ( ŷij ) from the inverse of the error variance and provides the error standard deviation ( σij ) of the reconstructed SST field.…”
Section: Variable Type Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the data assimilation analysis, the errors components on different temporal and spatial scales are related to scale aliasing and can negatively impact different scales analyses to a certain extent (Li et al, 2015a, 2015b). The advantages of scale‐selective data assimilation were widely researched by previous studies to eliminate scale aliasing (Beckers et al, 2014; Levin et al, 2018; Peng et al, 2010). Oceanic processes in NWTPO on intraseasonal and low‐frequency time scales respond to different controlling factors and thus different horizontal spatial scales (Kashino et al, 2011; Kessler, 1990; Meyers, 1979; Qiu & Lukas, 1996; Wang, Li, et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%