2020
DOI: 10.1111/jam.14564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method to evaluate factors influencing the microbial reduction in domestic dishwashers

Abstract: Aims:To develop a method that is able to determine the microbial reduction in different dishwasher cleaning cycles and differentiate between different program parameters used. Methods and Results: Stainless steel biomonitors were contaminated with Micrococcus luteus or Entereococcus faecium and cleaned in a specially programmed household dishwasher with different cleaning temperatures and durations. No detergent, bleach-free detergent or detergent containing activated oxygen bleach was used. The logarithmic re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The logarithmic reduction in Table 2 was determined according to follow the equation (Brands et al, 2020 ): Logarithmic reduction = log 10 (initial virus load) − log 10 (remaining virus load). Moreover, the reduction ratio (%) was calculated = (recovered virus or genome copies of the process Control − recovered virus or genome copies of the Treatment − LOD value of each virus)/(recovered virus or genome copies of the process Control − LOD value of each virus) × 100 (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The logarithmic reduction in Table 2 was determined according to follow the equation (Brands et al, 2020 ): Logarithmic reduction = log 10 (initial virus load) − log 10 (remaining virus load). Moreover, the reduction ratio (%) was calculated = (recovered virus or genome copies of the process Control − recovered virus or genome copies of the Treatment − LOD value of each virus)/(recovered virus or genome copies of the process Control − LOD value of each virus) × 100 (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The popularity of automatic dishwashers in households has increased and they are rapidly replacing manual washing, owing to their superior performance in effectively removing food residue particles in recent years (Rahman, 1985 ; Vivian et al, 2011 ). Meanwhile, longer cycles, combined wash programs, and high-operating temperatures also reduce the microbial load, thus maintaining a sufficient hygiene level on the food contact surface of the tableware (Brands et al, 2020 ). However, little research has been conducted on virus contaminant removal using household dishwashers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While on detergents, it must be mentioned that Brands and fellow researchers [68] managed to prove that, while it is a combination of three factors-time, temperature, and type of detergent-that determines the extent of microbial reduction, activated oxygen bleach (AOB) detergent (non-chlorinated) performed slightly better than its chlorinated counterpart. AOB was also shown to be effective against antibiotic-resistant species such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus [69].…”
Section: Use Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…AOB was also shown to be effective against antibiotic-resistant species such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus [69]. As AOB is slower acting than chlorinated alternatives, a longer time and a higher temperature is usually needed to compensate for the slowness [68], though Rehberg and colleagues in [69] have stated that it has the ability to inactivate resistant bacteria even at lower temperatures. The chlorine in detergents, residual chlorine, and disinfection byproducts in the wash/rinse water tend to interact with soluble proteins in food particles on the dishes and form trihalomethanes, which are released into both the greywater and the atmosphere (from the dishwater headspace) [53].…”
Section: Use Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect should apply for antibiotic resistant bacteria as well, since no significant differences between susceptible and resistant strains during laundering were obtained. The dishwasher sump and rubber seal provide good conditions for microbial growth while the walls only reveal low contaminations (40,49,55). Therefore, it can be assumed that dishes cleaned in the dishwasher show similar amounts of bacterial load.…”
Section: Effect Of Automated Dishwashing and Laundering On Antibioticmentioning
confidence: 99%