2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icalt.2014.163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Method to Evaluate Accessibility in E-learning Education Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous articles (Tables II, IV and V) have declared that various usability aspects lead to an increase in the dropout rates of e-learning systems. This declaration is justified with respect to the nature of e-learning and distraction raised by the design of an e-learning system (Batanero et al, 2014b;Daramola et al, 2017;Harder et al, 2016). With that, this research has achieved the two objectives formulated to drive the research.…”
Section: Usability Attributes Cited By Studiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerous articles (Tables II, IV and V) have declared that various usability aspects lead to an increase in the dropout rates of e-learning systems. This declaration is justified with respect to the nature of e-learning and distraction raised by the design of an e-learning system (Batanero et al, 2014b;Daramola et al, 2017;Harder et al, 2016). With that, this research has achieved the two objectives formulated to drive the research.…”
Section: Usability Attributes Cited By Studiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This also can be interpreted, as how much the user enjoys using the system (Alharbi et al, 2014). Batanero et al (2014a) provided guidelines to usability factors in HCI. Accordingly, they suggest perceivable, operable, understandable and robust as the key elements of usability.…”
Section: E-learning Systems' Usability Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, more accessibility research is needed. The standard [11] presents relevant information on the use of accessibility metadata [33]. The implementation of AfA 3.0 sought to socialize its applicability and greater understanding, which contributes to the gradually increasing learning curve [34].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noticed by Batanero et al (2014), there seems to be a relationship between WCAG 2.0 guidelines and those accessibility terms discussed above. It appears that those terms could be keywords for the intentions of some or most of the WCAG 2.0 principles.…”
Section: What Is Accessibility Metadata?mentioning
confidence: 95%